Copy link to clipboard
Copied
So far in 2024 the amount of time required for image submissions to Adobe Stock to be reviewed has grown exponentially. It used to be a few days, now it takes at least a month.
For context, I DO NOT upload AI generated images and I do not mark them as such. I have seen other posts stating that the AI content takes a long time to be reviewed because some people upload 500+ at once.
I upload somewhat sporadically and only around 3-10 images at a time. I tag all the images appropriately.
Does anyone have any ideas on what might be causing such a delay?
We don't really know why review times have grown considerably in the last few months. It could be because Gen AI continues to be submitted at high rates; it could also be because Adobe has reduced headcount in the Moderation staff. It could also be because Adobe has decided to throttle the influx of new assets into the database. I've only had 5 photographs (I also don't submit AI) reviewed in the last 2 months, and some of them had waited for 2-3 months to be looked at. Nevertheless, I keep up a
...Copy link to clipboard
Copied
You're responding to yourself ???
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
You're responding to yourself ???
By @Jill_C
I suppose that the time @terrybrooks posted this, Adobe did take down his account. There are people out there who are disapointed that they will not get rich and that buyers prefer other assets.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Yeah, I agree with @Peste65,. I really liked my adobe stock contributor portfolio for vector (also cause I got a higher percentage of earnings.) But uploaded new stuff exclusively to competitor. They take around 2 days(!) rather than 3 months to approve. So not sure if "doing all they can" is really convincing.
For buying photos on stock, I really loved how neat the process was of easy ordering and directly importing the images to photoshop with one click. But also switched to competition for buying now to a avoid low quality ai pictures and copyright issues on professional projects. Stock has unfortunately consistently been declining in user friendliness and quality over the last year.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I must say, after coming back from a trip in western USA and uploading both videos and photos I am stunned by how quickly its reviewed compared to earlier this year. Videos take 1 to 3 days (unless there is a lot of visual information from a city or so) and images between 2-5 days, most pass without any problem. Editorial images usually within 24 hours.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
(...) uploading both videos and photos I am stunned by how quickly its reviewed compared to earlier this year. Videos take 1 to 3 days (unless there is a lot of visual information from a city or so) and images between 2-5 days, most pass without any problem. Editorial images usually within 24 hours.
By @John315713866f38
You are getting a happy streak, I suppose.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I guess, or I am not uploading any AI at the same time so I get priority? Its been this quick for the last 2-3 weeks.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
So not sure if "doing all they can" is really convincing.
By @Eva36887359nzz2
Check the number of new items in a week time. Adobe stock is growing incredibly fast. But I agree that there is a huge quality issue regarding generative AI assets. However, it also seem that they sell like crazy.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I'm at 8 months now for some submissions. What other sites are you all using that are better?
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I'm at 8 months now for some submissions. What other sites are you all using that are better?
By @N D H
Moderation speed: any other site.
Number of sales: none.
Find more inspiration, events, and resources on the new Adobe Community
Explore Now