Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Minhas imagens foram recusadas.
Alegação:
"Durante nossa análise, descobrimos há elementos que parecem estar protegidos pelas leis de propriedade intelectual, portanto, não podemos aceitá-los em nossa coleção. "
Detalhe, sou fotógrafo e eu tirei todas as fotos que enviei.
Realmente isso é muito revoltante.
Algumas das fotos recusadas.
Por favor revisem isso direito, nas minhas fotos tem até a minha logo.
IMG_5504.JPG - over saturated, over processed to the point where it looks like oil paint brush strokes. Visible logos.
IMG_5503.JPG - very noisy
IMG-0205.JPG - over saturated, over processed, not sharp
IMG_2914.JPG - noisy, monochrome conversion not allowed
1956 - chroma noise, blown out areas
2913 - noise and blur
20210824_061635-1.jpg - noise and overprocessed
5551 - noise and blur
5555 - noise, blur, blownout
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Remove your logo and your images will probably be approved. It's that simple. Watermarks and logos are not allowed.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Thanks
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
@daniellei4510 is right. You must remove your logo. However, I believe that most of the photos will get disapproved due to quality issues. They are nice photos however, most seem out of focus, are noisy, and some have lighting issues. Software can resolve these issues. I also believe you should reframe. I.e. "The Rule of Thirds".
Example:
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Agreed, I was a little generous there, without having taken a close look at all the images. But yes, they would at least have been given greater consideration had the logos been removed.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Quality issues — easy refusal at first sight.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
The watermark is an absolute no-go. You can't add your logo as this to pictures that should be used commercially. The buyer is entitled to a non-marked asset. But even so, and just looking at your first image, you have focussing problems, colour noise, unnatural colours, and bad editing, just to name those. So even by omitting your logo, you will get a refusal on the quality.
Edit: I cross-checked two or three of the images, they are all unusable, over edited unsharp, with wrong colours.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
IMG_5504.JPG - over saturated, over processed to the point where it looks like oil paint brush strokes. Visible logos.
IMG_5503.JPG - very noisy
IMG-0205.JPG - over saturated, over processed, not sharp
IMG_2914.JPG - noisy, monochrome conversion not allowed
1956 - chroma noise, blown out areas
2913 - noise and blur
20210824_061635-1.jpg - noise and overprocessed
5551 - noise and blur
5555 - noise, blur, blownout