Exit
  • Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
  • 한국 커뮤니티
7

Imagens recusadas

New Here ,
Jan 19, 2024 Jan 19, 2024

Minhas imagens foram recusadas.

 

Alegação:

"Durante nossa análise, descobrimos há elementos que parecem estar protegidos pelas leis de propriedade intelectual, portanto, não podemos aceitá-los em nossa coleção. "

Detalhe, sou fotógrafo e eu tirei todas as fotos que enviei.

Realmente isso é muito revoltante.

Algumas das fotos recusadas.

Por favor revisem isso direito, nas minhas fotos tem até a minha logo.

TOPICS
Contributor critique , Contributors , Troubleshooting
859
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 1 Correct answer

Community Expert , Jan 19, 2024 Jan 19, 2024

IMG_5504.JPG - over saturated, over processed to the point where it looks like oil paint brush strokes. Visible logos.

IMG_5503.JPG - very noisy

IMG-0205.JPG - over saturated, over processed, not sharp

IMG_2914.JPG - noisy, monochrome conversion not allowed 

1956 - chroma noise, blown out areas 

2913 - noise and blur 

20210824_061635-1.jpg - noise and overprocessed 

5551 - noise and blur 

5555 - noise,  blur, blownout 

IMG_0452.jpeg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Translate
Community Expert ,
Jan 19, 2024 Jan 19, 2024

Remove your logo and your images will probably be approved. It's that simple. Watermarks and logos are not allowed.


daniellei4510 | Forum Volunteer | I just had surgery and my opinions are medically induced.
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
New Here ,
Jan 19, 2024 Jan 19, 2024

Thanks

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jan 19, 2024 Jan 19, 2024

@daniellei4510 is right. You must remove your logo. However, I believe that most of the photos will get disapproved due to quality issues. They are nice photos however, most seem out of focus, are noisy, and some have lighting issues.  Software can resolve these issues. I also believe you should reframe. I.e. "The Rule of Thirds".

Example:

1-Edit-Edit.jpg

========================================
Photography is more than just pressing a button!
========================================
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jan 19, 2024 Jan 19, 2024

Agreed, I was a little generous there, without having taken a close look at all the images. But yes, they would at least have been given greater consideration had the logos been removed.


daniellei4510 | Forum Volunteer | I just had surgery and my opinions are medically induced.
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jan 19, 2024 Jan 19, 2024

Quality issues — easy refusal at first sight.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jan 19, 2024 Jan 19, 2024

The watermark is an absolute no-go. You can't add your logo as this to pictures that should be used commercially. The buyer is entitled to a non-marked asset. But even so, and just looking at your first image, you have focussing problems, colour noise, unnatural colours, and bad editing, just to name those. So even by omitting your logo, you will get a refusal on the quality.

 

Edit: I cross-checked two or three of the images, they are all unusable, over edited unsharp, with wrong colours.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jan 19, 2024 Jan 19, 2024

If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jan 19, 2024 Jan 19, 2024
LATEST

IMG_5504.JPG - over saturated, over processed to the point where it looks like oil paint brush strokes. Visible logos.

IMG_5503.JPG - very noisy

IMG-0205.JPG - over saturated, over processed, not sharp

IMG_2914.JPG - noisy, monochrome conversion not allowed 

1956 - chroma noise, blown out areas 

2913 - noise and blur 

20210824_061635-1.jpg - noise and overprocessed 

5551 - noise and blur 

5555 - noise,  blur, blownout 

IMG_0452.jpeg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jill C., Forum Volunteer
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines