It gets to the point that in the description I write "a painting on the theme of the defense of an ancient fortress.
AI-generated" and get a "Quality issue" rejection. How can this be? It's a painting!
Everything that concerns logistics and cargo transportation is rejected, almost everything about transport is rejected, medicine - 100% of rejections, children in a sandbox, disabled people in a wheelchair, historical paintings, dragons, unicorns - all of this is rejected 100% for me.
At the same time, some of the others are missed. Because all of this is on time. As if the problem is not in the quality, but in who can be given an extended list, and most cannot.
If this is not the case, please show me what the problem is.
What quality the images lack.
I tried generating similar images, changing the background, sizes... - but almost everything beautiful, that "catches", that has emotions, is rejected.
Even if I add the text "Created by AI" to the title
[Moderator moved the thread to the correct forum]
2 Correct answers
You said: "
So that I understand that you are really checking, and not rejecting because "I'm in a bad mood today".
Of course, I can't influence moderation. But I want to understand what the "rules of the game" really are."
You are not addressing Adobe directly here, nor any of its Moderators, and will not receive a reply from them here. We are a community of fellow Contributors, with experience looking at thousands of rejected images, so we have a pretty good idea of what constitutes an acceptab
14
Replies
I want to publish quality content. Help me with this
By @Anita Felix
Correct the errors in your not so perfect assets.
Ok.
Cool!
And what if I sent a "painting about the events of the 15th century" for review.
In fact, this is what made me come here.
When moderation rejected paintings or images of a unicorn.
Below are 2 examples.
Tell me, what quality issues are there?
So that I understand that you are really checking, and not rejecting because "I'm in a bad mood today".
Of course, I can't influence moderation. But I want to understand what the "rules of the game" really are.
+
If we have common goals of creating high-quality interesting content, give me advice on how to title such paintings so that moderation will let them through
------------------------------------------------------
1.
ID pliku: 1317129005
Title: Siege of an ancient fortress from the sea and from the land. Generative AI
u9399342888_Ultra_realistic_view_of_the_destruction_of_Constant_38581bc4-12a4-4e99-909a-68f89c453dfd.png
2.
ID pliku: 1317128759
Title: Car and truck from World War II race along the highway. Generative AI
u9399342888_Two_vehicles_blue_happy_New_Years_Rolls-Royce_racin_4528e47e-53e1-4a47-b89e-46f900a6639b.png
3.
ID pliku: 1317119731
Title: Sailboat with people is wrecked in the sea during a storm. Image generative AI
u9399342888_The_boat_in_the_middle_of_the_lake_rocking_with_str_d7cabf47-4f88-49a9-8a7d-a3ce0053e9c2.png
The moderators are having very good days. Your titles are fine. I suspect moderators only give them a cursory glance.
You said: "
So that I understand that you are really checking, and not rejecting because "I'm in a bad mood today".
Of course, I can't influence moderation. But I want to understand what the "rules of the game" really are."
You are not addressing Adobe directly here, nor any of its Moderators, and will not receive a reply from them here. We are a community of fellow Contributors, with experience looking at thousands of rejected images, so we have a pretty good idea of what constitutes an acceptable level of quality.
These drawings are full of AI drawing errors, which to some extent might be acceptable in an artistic painting, but in this case, the details are just too flawed. For example:
By the way, png file format is to be used only for transparent images. These should have been submitted as jpg's.
This one is littered with too many unidentifiable objects. Painterly or not, a painting in this style would have far more detail. That's not your fault. It's the fault of your AI program. Of all AI programs, for that matter. The more people, the more the chance for errors.
From time to time, I also think, would it be better if I tried to learn photography or illustration instead of producing images with artificial intelligence? I haven't made a clear decision yet.
You do not need to look very hard to find quality issues in your assets. It took me one tenth of a second.
AdChoices