Property releases

[Verbbaitum]

I recently submitted the two attached images. One was approved using the attached property release. The other was refused because of the same property release. Which is it? It frustrates the hell out of me! If the company gives me permission in writing to use their brands and logos what's the problem?!!!! 

[moderator deleted property release. Please do not post private information like e-mails and phone numbers]

[Fabiobtex · Accepted solution]

If the first photo (0499) was the refused one, you would probably need Montain Dew release too. If it was the other way around, I really don't know how to help

[Test Screen Name]

Boat name? Or drink?

[George_F]

I'm guessing DSC_0499 is the rejected photo?

[ricky336]

Highly likely because of the Mountian Dew bottle, and possibly the neck strap.

[Abambo]

You should really tell us, what got rejected and what got accepted. We are not your guessing clowns. This said, I strogly assume that 0499 got rejected:

As a side note: DO NOT PUBLISH PRIVATE INFORMATION HERE!

[Jill_C]

Highly unlikely that you'd ever get a release from Pepsi-Cola, owner of the Mountain Dew brand! Each image needs to be carefully inspected for any and ALL brand names before posting. 

[RALPH_L]

Both photos should be rejected. You need a model release and several property releases.

[Verbbaitum]

I had both. One for the model and another property release for Rapala. One
was approved and the other was rejected. Why?

--


Mike Gnatkowski
[Moderator deleted private information. Please do not post private information like e-mails and phone numbers]

[Jill_C]

Did you read any of the above comments? The Mountain Dew bottle is most definitely the reason why the first didn't get approved. It would be easy to edit it out.

[Abambo]

Don't put your e-mail signature in when responding via e-mail. I think we had that discussion before!

[ricky336]

I had both. One for the model and another property release for Rapala. One
was approved and the other was rejected. Why?

--
By @Verbbaitum

Why?

Because you didn't have any other property issues in 0133. The IP and model release would have been enough.

In the other photo there are other IP issuses. Don't forget about the small things, like branded drink and neck straps!

They all count!

[Sam_K7772]

ohkk...