Quality problems on photo

[IDeddy]

Можете ли вы сказать мне, что именно заставляет Adobe не принимать файлы? 
The files are large in pixel size, as well as removed noise and artifacts, on Shutterstock everything is accepted, here it is not
Does it think they are low exposure or something?

[ricky336]

Hello, As you have given an example of a print screen, can't comment on the quality as it's a print screen. Can you upload an original file? Also, just because Shutterstock accepted them, doesn't mean Adobe will. They both have different standards!

[ricky336 · Accepted solution]

Hello,

I think underexposure:

for both of them!

I do not see any IP problems.

[Abambo · Accepted solution]

I would add noise (a) and editing (?) artefacts (b):

And there is also uneven lightning.

See also artefacts for the CR2032 writing. You also have chromatic aberration on the CR2032 batterie.

[RALPH_L]

First of all, you should post the original so that we can review them. Focus and exposure are deffinately not good. But, why did Shutterstaock accept these images when there are visual property violations that require property releases.

In the first image, the chip socket is a LGA socket. The name is clearly visible.

[IDeddy]

The land grid array (LGA) is a type of surface-mount  packaging for integrated circuits  (ICs) that is notable for having the pins on the socket  (when a socket is used) — as opposed to pins on the integrated circuit, known as a pin grid array  (PGA). An LGA can be electrically connected to a printed circuit board  (PCB) either by the use of a socket or by soldering  directly to the board.
For those who do not know what is LGA I will leave the text from wikipedia, this abbreviation is not a brand name and does not violate anyone's property. Adobe complained only about the quality, so no need to write about property rights please.

[Abambo · Accepted solution]

Adobe complained only about the quality, so no need to write about property rights please.

By @IDeddy

Adobe refuses on the first error seen. That does not mean that there are no other errors, especially different error codes, with an asset. You can get a quality refusal, and after addressing the quality, you can get an IP refusal.

I agree, LGA is not a trademark; however, LOTES is the manufacturer of the socket and, as such, it represents an IP violation in addition to quality issues. As for the capacitors, the C with the point in may also be a logo.

LOTES means also that the Shutterstock approval is wrong, also according to Shutterstock's rules.

Approval does not mean that they are error free. It just means that the image moderator did not detect errors.

[Jill_C]

Not sure why you're posting a Shutterstock screen capture here and looking for advice as to why these were rejected... screen prints are useless for evaluation. There are obvious IP violations.

[IDeddy]

Adobe complained only about the quality, so no need to write about property rights please.

[RALPH_L]

Still focus and exposure are in my opinion an issue. I do believe that Intell owns the rights to a "Land Grid Array". So yes, I do believe property rights are also an issue. But, ignore that if you think, and I may be, wrong.

[ricky336 · Accepted solution]

According to Bing Chat,  LGA is not protected by IP, as it is a type of integrated circuit design.

It would be like saying AA/AAA batteries are IP-protected, or the CR2032 battery is IP-protected.

[Abambo]

I do believe that Intell owns the rights to a "Land Grid Array".

By @RALPH_L

It does not look like they do:

LGA is a WIPO trademark of TÜV Rheinland. There are also several other figurative trademarks to be found in the database, but nothing in relation with electronics. So that should not be an issue.

[Abambo]

Adobe complained only about the quality, so no need to write about property rights please.

By @IDeddy

See here: https://community.adobe.com/t5/stock-contributors-discussions/quality-problems-on-photo/m-p/14260596...

[Nancy OShea]

Watermarks are not allowed.

Adobe Stock customers expect the highest visual and technical quality for use in commercial projects.😉   Most of what you need to know is contained in the Stock Contributor User Guide.  Re-read it carefully.

• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html/stock/contributor/help/photography-illustr...
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/how-to/tips-stock-image-acceptance.html
• Property Release: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/property-release.html

Submitting the same images to multiple Stock agencies diminishes the value of your asset.  You're competing with yourself and likely to make less royalty fees.  Something to consider.

[IDeddy]

Thanks for the standardized and unhelpful answer in your particular situation. I could read the rules myself, which I did before I started uploading files.

[IDeddy]

The land grid array (LGA) is a type of surface-mount  packaging for integrated circuits  (ICs) that is notable for having the pins on the socket  (when a socket is used) — as opposed to pins on the integrated circuit, known as a pin grid array  (PGA). An LGA can be electrically connected to a printed circuit board  (PCB) either by the use of a socket or by soldering  directly to the board.
For those who do not know what is LGA I will leave the text from wikipedia, this abbreviation is not a brand name and does not violate anyone's property. Adobe complained only about the quality, so no need to write about property rights please.

[Abambo]

Adobe complained only about the quality, so no need to write about property rights please.

By @IDeddy

See here: https://community.adobe.com/t5/stock-contributors-discussions/quality-problems-on-photo/m-p/14260596...

[Abambo]

Never assume that Adobe stock accepts what other providers accept. Quality criteria are different.

[IDeddy]

Ok