Rechazadas por falta de Calidad (Sesion Vigilante de Seguridad)

[alejandrom6594753]

Necesito saber donde estan los errores en estas fotografias. Gracias

[RALPH_L]

Photo 1: overexposed highlights, horizon not level, IP violations

Photo 2, Photo 3 & Photo 4: overexposed highlights, distracting object (bench / people)

On all photos the depth of field could have been more.

[Abambo]

ALE2402:

1. Overexposure
2. Framing. What is that person looking at? There is nothing interesting to see.

In addition, I would say that you will also get a refusal for IP, because of the man's shirt.

2406: Chromatic aberration:

Soft focus, noise, background overexposed. Bad Framing: the second person, hidden by the security guy, bench in the image. In addition: you should repair the security man's walkie-talkie. The missing blacks result in a contrast poor image:

2400: Chromatic aberration

overexposed background, bad logo edit

Missing contrast, bad framing. A crop like this would have been better, probably:

2407: The first one with potential! The framing could be better:

This one is missing whites. The white balance needs to be adapted. This one gets accepted after some modifications.