• Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
Exit
0

Rejected due to quality. Please tell me what is wrong with this photo? I filters weren't applied

New Here ,
Mar 14, 2023 Mar 14, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

IMG_0779.JPG

TOPICS
Contributor critique

Views

143

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 3 Correct answers

Community Expert , Mar 14, 2023 Mar 14, 2023

The white balance is incorrect, and the framing is not good.

The exposure is erroneous:

Abambo_0-1678815790397.png

(blacks are missing)

You have chromatic aberration and colour noise.

The signs will earn you a refusal for IP violation.

Votes

Translate

Translate
Community Expert , Mar 14, 2023 Mar 14, 2023

Hello,

In this case, it could look like you added a filter actually, even if you didn't. You see, the problem is the colour temperature/white balance. You need to fix this. I guess it was taken in the shade. Correct the white balance - bring more warmth to the picture and crop out the sides a bit - e.g:

IMG_0779white balance.jpg

 

But, you do need to edit out the signs, because most probably it will get caught for IP reasons.

Have a read about IP release requirements:
https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/property-release.html

...

Votes

Translate

Translate
Community Expert , Mar 14, 2023 Mar 14, 2023

The white balance is off and it needs an IP release for the two signs.

Votes

Translate

Translate
Community Expert ,
Mar 14, 2023 Mar 14, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

The white balance is incorrect, and the framing is not good.

The exposure is erroneous:

Abambo_0-1678815790397.png

(blacks are missing)

You have chromatic aberration and colour noise.

The signs will earn you a refusal for IP violation.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Mar 14, 2023 Mar 14, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hello,

In this case, it could look like you added a filter actually, even if you didn't. You see, the problem is the colour temperature/white balance. You need to fix this. I guess it was taken in the shade. Correct the white balance - bring more warmth to the picture and crop out the sides a bit - e.g:

IMG_0779white balance.jpg

 

But, you do need to edit out the signs, because most probably it will get caught for IP reasons.

Have a read about IP release requirements:
https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/property-release.html

 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Mar 14, 2023 Mar 14, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

The white balance is off and it needs an IP release for the two signs.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Mar 14, 2023 Mar 14, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

White balance is too cool, and the composition is odd - too much pavement in the foreground. You would also need to remove all logos and signs to avoid an IP rejection.

Jill C., Forum Volunteer

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines