rejected illustration

[Claudia38636494iiq1]

I would like to know why my illustration was rejected. It says "technical problems", 
but I sent this illustration like all the previous ones that were accepted. So how will I know the 
real reason?

I'm losing the desire to continue at Adobe.

[Nancy OShea]

Sorry, my crystal ball isn't working today.

If you want feedback, you'll have to post the full size image here so we can examine it.

In the meantime, read your Stock Contributor User Guide & compare your work with other Stock inventory. The quality bar is higher now than it used to be.

• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html/stock/contributor/help/photography-illustr...
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/how-to/tips-stock-image-acceptance.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/vector-requirements.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/generative-ai-content.html

[Abambo]

You need to show us your asset in the quality as submitted.

I also have trouble getting a clear picture from my crystal ball, the same as @Nancy OShea. We are contributors like you, and we do not have insight into your account. We can, however, check assets when you publish them here.

[Nancy OShea]

I'm losing the desire to continue at Adobe.

By @Claudia38636494iiq1

============

That's your choice to make. But rejection is not personal. It's a business decision.  Stock knows what their customers search for and purchase. 

When customers complain about poor quality & demand refunds, it reflects badly on Stock's reputation. 

There are other microstock services with lower acceptance standards you can try. But Adobe pays higher royalty fees. So there's that to consider.

[daniellei4510]

It would definitely help to actually SEE the asset in question. That's what this forum is for. A hand-drawn illustration? AI? Help us out here. 😉