Welcome Dialog

Welcome to the Community!

We have a brand new look! Take a tour with us and explore the latest updates on Adobe Support Community.


Rejection

New Here ,
Oct 26, 2021 Oct 26, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hello guys I'm new here so I just wanted to start out with a bunch of pictures to test out the waters and I got all of them rejected. 

TOPICS
Contributor critique, Contributors, Troubleshooting

Views

152

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 3 Correct answers

Adobe Community Professional , Oct 26, 2021 Oct 26, 2021
Here are some of the issues noted upon a quick examination: 1) very noisy and soft-focus 2) chromatic aberration is very obvious 3) underexposed, soft focus, chromatic aberration 4) underexposed, not in focus, noisy 5) not in sharp focus, chromatic aberration 6) not in focus, chromatic aberration, white balance problem 7) significant objectionable digital artifacts throughout

Likes

Translate

Translate
Adobe Community Professional , Oct 26, 2021 Oct 26, 2021
Hi @Zaki5E74 , They are all underexposed and excessively noisy. The fourth one also has a white balance issue. The fifth image has color fringing on the edge of the branches. The sixth photo is out of focus and lack vibrancy. The seventh image is a beautiful landscape capture. I like the composition. To view the faults of the images please zoom to between 100 and 200%. Best wishes JG Photographer and Nutrition Author

Likes

Translate

Translate
Adobe Community Professional , Oct 27, 2021 Oct 27, 2021
too dark and too much noise is a good place to start.

Likes

Translate

Translate
Adobe Community Professional ,
Oct 26, 2021 Oct 26, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Here are some of the issues noted upon a quick examination:

1) very noisy and soft-focus

2) chromatic aberration is very obvious

3) underexposed, soft focus, chromatic aberration

4) underexposed, not in focus, noisy

5) not in sharp focus, chromatic aberration

6) not in focus, chromatic aberration, white balance problem

7) significant objectionable digital artifacts throughout

 

 

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe Community Professional ,
Oct 26, 2021 Oct 26, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hi @Zaki5E74 ,

They are all underexposed and excessively noisy.

The fourth one also has a white balance issue.

The fifth image has color fringing on the edge of the branches.

The sixth photo is out of focus and lack vibrancy.

The seventh image is a beautiful landscape capture. I like the composition.

To view the faults of the images please zoom to between 100 and 200%.

 

Best wishes

JG

Photographer and Nutrition Author

 

 

 

 

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe Community Professional ,
Oct 27, 2021 Oct 27, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

too dark and too much noise is a good place to start.

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe Community Professional ,
Oct 27, 2021 Oct 27, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

0469: besides being out of focus, it also shows sensor dust and a white balance that is of. If it were of acceptable quality, you would need to submit a model release for the man represented.

hb: besides the technical issues (out of focus, chromatic aberration, contrast, noise), you would need model releases from all people in the picture. Why did you shoot such a scene at ISO 400? There was no need for.

riyadh sun: I do not see any value in this picture.

hb 2: underexposed, out of focus and noisy. Maybe there is also an IP problem, as it looks like there is kind of a logo in the image.

luzern: is missing blacks and whites in the histogram. If it were in focus, it could be saved with a small perspective correction and editing out the slightly disturbing light in front.

3705: even as a small image, it is out of focus.

0829: artefacts where you look at. It's not savable, but on your own social media account it will get countless likes…

 

If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

 

 

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines