Release

[viktoriia_9640]

Hello. photographs that were submitted for review were rejected.
attach the correct release, it still fails.
Or do you have new rules and for background filming you also need a location release?

[oleschwander]

If you want an answer you have to upload an image or film clip here.

[viktoriia_9640]

there is still a problem that my releases are not accepted on the stock even though they are correct.do you need a propert release on such photos?
I remember it was not necessary before.

I don't understand what's wrong with the release?
Is it true?!

[Moderator deleted private information. Please do not post private information like e-mails and phone numbers]

[oleschwander · Accepted solution]

You don't need a model release for this kind of images. But you will need a property release..

[daniellei4510]

Were you told specifically that the assets were rejected for lack of a release?

[Jill_C]

Not sure why you attached a model release on these subjects...no person is shown.

[Abambo]

OK, the thumbnails showed are not very clear, but it seems to me that on some, if not on all photos, you see logos or other protected items. 

It may also be, that one or the other item design is protected by trademarks. 

You will not need to publish a model release, as you cannot recognize the model from her hand, and there isn't any implied nudity that would require it, even for a partial body shoot.

So check first for (hidden) logos, then for specific recognizable design marks. Then check the quality as the may be a possibility that the moderator did err on the reason. (If, however, by submitting a second time, there is still a release required, then I assume that the refusal is consistent with the published reason.)