Technical problems

Community Beginner ,
Oct 21, 2021 Oct 21, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hey guys, am a new contributer 🙂

Anybody have an idea why these pics are bad?

TOPICS
Troubleshooting

Views

105

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe Community Professional ,
Oct 21, 2021 Oct 21, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Unsightly shadows, artifacts, sensor spot and blown out regions.

 

image.png

 

Nancy O'Shea, Adobe Product User & Community Professional
Alt-Web Design & Publishing ~ Web : Print : Graphics : Media

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe Community Professional ,
Oct 21, 2021 Oct 21, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Adobe Stock customers expect the highest visual and technical quality for use in commercial projects like posters, brochures, product packages, t-shirts, coffee mugs, video & TV ads, etc...

 

Nancy O'Shea, Adobe Product User & Community Professional
Alt-Web Design & Publishing ~ Web : Print : Graphics : Media

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Beginner ,
Oct 21, 2021 Oct 21, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Thank you, but circle it's glare of the sun🙃

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe Community Professional ,
Oct 21, 2021 Oct 21, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Sun flares are unwelcomed in Stock photography.

Read the Stock Contributor User Guide carefully, especially the DOs and DONT's section.

 

 

Nancy O'Shea, Adobe Product User & Community Professional
Alt-Web Design & Publishing ~ Web : Print : Graphics : Media

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe Community Professional ,
Oct 22, 2021 Oct 22, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hello,

The lens flare as it is called - is bad in this case. It is very distracting and would never sell!

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Beginner ,
Oct 22, 2021 Oct 22, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

What you think about first photo?

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe Community Professional ,
Oct 22, 2021 Oct 22, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Composition. You have a patch of sky in the corner, so the viewer can be distracted by this. Also when viewed at 100% the quality of the photo isn't that good. The quality has to be good for commercial use!

Do read the help guides from Adobe!

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe Community Professional ,
Oct 22, 2021 Oct 22, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

7076: You did shoot this one at ISO 2500, which means that you needed to do a lot of noise reduction to get this level. Noise reduction, however, does not come for free. You also destroy the fine structure that is still left in the picture despite the high ISO. The exposure time is 1/1000s and as trees rarely jump out of the view, you can go down to a fairly reasonable exposure time. The background is underexposed. You also could have framed the picture in such a way, that there is less background in the view.

 

7475: Not only do you have that very disturbing spot in the picture, you also have a high noise level. As said above, you should really set the ISO level to the lowest possible value. Such static objects do not need that fast exposure time of 1/1300s.

 

If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Beginner ,
Oct 22, 2021 Oct 22, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

Thank you very much 🙂

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines