• Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
Exit
0

unacceptance of photos

Community Beginner ,
Jun 04, 2024 Jun 04, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I uploaded 2 photos without any filters. I just clicked with my mobile phone. I don't know why they didn't accept it. they have given reason as quality issue. It will be great if you give feedback on this.

TOPICS
Contributor critique , Contributors

Views

179

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 2 Correct answers

Explorer , Jun 04, 2024 Jun 04, 2024

Hi! Unfortunately the photo is really of very poor quality. If you look at the photo on a smartphone screen, you may think it looks great. But I advise you to open the photo on a big screen and view it at 100% scale. If you open these photos in full size, you will notice a large number of defects.
1. In the first photo, due to insufficient light, digital noise in the shadows is clearly visible. The situation is aggravated by smartphone algorithms that try to suppress these noises making all objec

...

Votes

Translate

Translate
Community Expert , Jun 04, 2024 Jun 04, 2024

First:

Clipping and colour noise in the background. The asset looks like a phone picture. There are missing contrast.

Abambo_0-1717510518346.png

Missing details due to the excessive (in-camera) post-processing. If the picture had been of a better quality, you would have needed a model release for some people in the image. The exposure is not the best.

Second:

The image is overexposed, as shown by the histogram:

Abambo_1-1717510812834.png

You have missing blacks (left).

You also have heavy artefacts in the picture:

Abambo_2-1717510919533.png

I do not know what these signs

...

Votes

Translate

Translate
Explorer ,
Jun 04, 2024 Jun 04, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hi! Unfortunately the photo is really of very poor quality. If you look at the photo on a smartphone screen, you may think it looks great. But I advise you to open the photo on a big screen and view it at 100% scale. If you open these photos in full size, you will notice a large number of defects.
1. In the first photo, due to insufficient light, digital noise in the shadows is clearly visible. The situation is aggravated by smartphone algorithms that try to suppress these noises making all objects very blurry and flat.
2. Due to the fact that the smartphone camera has a small sensor, both photos have very low detail of objects.
3. Both photos have problems with shutter speed, so the objects lose clarity and look blurry. 
From my experience I can say that it is not an easy task to make a quality photo on the phone camera. On a small screen of the phone photo may look good, but a detailed examination will show a lot of artifacts.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jun 04, 2024 Jun 04, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

@Oleksandra Osadcha,

You can add pictures in-line, either with the “Insert Photos” icon or by copy/paste your screenshots here.

Abambo_0-1717511250161.png

That avoids that people need to open your attachements to see what you want to show. For the OP it's always best to attach the original pictures as @Deepak37823964fzpv has correctly done.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Explorer ,
Jun 04, 2024 Jun 04, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Great! Thank you so much for the tip!  Next time I will take your advice 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Beginner ,
Jun 05, 2024 Jun 05, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Thanks Oleksandra for your valuable inputs.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jun 04, 2024 Jun 04, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

First:

Clipping and colour noise in the background. The asset looks like a phone picture. There are missing contrast.

Abambo_0-1717510518346.png

Missing details due to the excessive (in-camera) post-processing. If the picture had been of a better quality, you would have needed a model release for some people in the image. The exposure is not the best.

Second:

The image is overexposed, as shown by the histogram:

Abambo_1-1717510812834.png

You have missing blacks (left).

You also have heavy artefacts in the picture:

Abambo_2-1717510919533.png

I do not know what these signs represent, but they should be rock sharp:

Abambo_3-1717510982365.png

If they were sharp, you would probably get a refusal for IP reasons.

The image is missing contrasts.

 

For both pictures, the portrait mode is most likely not the best format for such pictures.

 

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Beginner ,
Jun 05, 2024 Jun 05, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Thank you Abambo.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jun 05, 2024 Jun 05, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST
quote

Thank you Abambo.


By @Deepak37823964fzpv

You're welcome.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jun 04, 2024 Jun 04, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hello,

Generally speaking, smartphone pictures don't do so well on stock. The sensor is too small to show detail. They are fine on a small screen, but not on a large monitor, or printing to a large size.

Even at 100% noise - 'grain' to use film speak isn't that good for digital photos and artefacts - areas where the pixels are seen - as given in another post.

 

Have a read of this. It's a brief guide on quality:
https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html

 

 

 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Beginner ,
Jun 05, 2024 Jun 05, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Thank you Ricky

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jun 04, 2024 Jun 04, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Zoom in on each of these images and you'll easily see how blurry and noisy they are. Cell phone snapshots are rarely going to be acceptable for stock, unless they're taken under perfect lighting conditions.

Jill C., Forum Volunteer

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Beginner ,
Jun 05, 2024 Jun 05, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Thank you Jill.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jun 04, 2024 Jun 04, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Sadly these look like snapshots as opposed to professional quality photographs.

 

Compare your work with available Stock inventory.  It helps to see what you're competing with. 

 

Unlike social media, Adobe Stock customers expect the highest visual and technical quality for use in commercial projects.

Hope that helps.

 

Nancy O'Shea— Product User, Community Expert & Moderator
Alt-Web Design & Publishing ~ Web : Print : Graphics : Media

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Beginner ,
Jun 05, 2024 Jun 05, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Thank you Nancy.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines