Why this pictures weren't accept

[Kyle353066797rdo]

 I dont know what adobe need more to do to accept this picture  ??? This is a "quality issue", really ?  

[Ricky336 · Accepted solution]

Hello,

Yes, actually, there is a quality issue here! Firstly, one will argue your leaning perspectives of the buildings - typical when taken with a wide-angle lens, secondly - the sun is a little burnt out, so it makes it a white blob, so to speak. The toning may also be an issue, even though it is an evening shot.

Also, when submitting don't include frames!!

Have a read of this. It's a brief guide on quality:
https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html

[Kyle353066797rdo]

Hi, i dont get a part "perspective of building" is that mean a building have to be straight like a have to use lens tilt-shilf ??

Thanks for a tell me a frame

[Ricky336]

The buildings ideally should be perpendicular, like if you used a tilt-shift lens. This can be corrected in Lightroom/Photoshop etc. They shouldn't lean.

[Jill_C]

Straightening images is an easy fix in Lightroom Classic using the Transform tool.

[Kyle353066797rdo]

Thank u for letting me know. This is an old picture and i didn't correct that. Ill try to remove frame and edit again this picture few more steps

[Jill_C]

I wouldn't bother trying to reupload to Adobe Stock. The fundamental issues of blur and artifacts cannot be fixed. 

[Abambo]

Yes, it's really a quality issue.

It's overexposed (blacks are missing);

But in the dark areas, there is no detail like with this ship.

It looks like you have applied a filter, that simulates old paper prints.

In addition the frame is not allowed, but that would have been a non-compliant refusal.

If the picture had been as sharp as required, it could well be that this logo would constitute an IP issue:

This surly does:

In addition: If you check the image, you see strong compression artefacts.

Other points have been named by @Ricky336 

If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

[Kyle353066797rdo]

I understand underexpose issue but the detail on this picture only 16mp, can not enough for that much detail 

Thanks for telling me.

[Abambo]

I check at the pixel (or at 200%). The detail should be there, or the processing or the lens did create a degradation. 16Mp is OK. It's not great (for today's standards), but it is OK.

[Kyle353066797rdo]

Ty for letting me know. Can u let me know why this picture wasnt accept too (a picture i upload without watermark) is that overexporsure ??

[Abambo]

• Black and white
• Clipping in the corners:
• Shadows underexposed.
• Artefacts.

You shouldn't apply filters to your pictures, at least not filters that make a picture look like a filter got applied. That renders the asset unusable.

[RALPH_L]

In addition to what @Ricky336 said, the shadows are under exposed.