osgood_ wrote for some strange reason people seem to think that is what Im saying or implying I guess seek out the common denominator, that may provide the answer as to why that happens. osgood_ wrote Im NOT discussing any editors capabilities to produce design/layout, Im discussing the code it/they produce. There is a BIG BIG difference you know, right? Well thats interesting, since previously in this thread you lumped Wappler & Pinegrow with the likes of Wix & Webflow. Yet Pinegrow by contrast works with native user source, what restricts Wappler from doing the same "as an editor" if someone desires? So yes big difference as you say, so it seems rather strange to not understand the basic differences of Wappler / Pinegrow vs Wix / Webflow. osgood_ wrote So far I have seen little evidence to convince me that Wappler is anything apart from a money making product for the developers of it aimed at the amatuer 'developer', of which there are millions of course. It will find its place amongst the many other products which aim at that demographic, Pinegrow, Wix, Webflow etc as its innovative for sure but not in the sense its a professional web-development tool as no one who claims to be professional will use it All this "what professionals use" and whom are amateurs sounds familiar. Yet you appear to still keep looking for a mythical editor and certain requirements, when above you clearly said "any editor" will do in the right hands? I'm assuming based on your comments you own a pair of those hands, so its a bit amusing. osgood_ wrote infact I know I'm right, yet again [...] I rest my case. You could probably place that in a recursive loop and condition it with the common denominator and a break. Allowing you to speed up finding the answer to the "strange reason" your speak of. But yeah that was not brash or absent of humility on your part. 😉
... View more