You might want to hold on a bit Here is Nancy's copy and paste code cleaned up a bit for more practical applications: Scrolling Marquee Demo You should also be wary of the limitations in using a pure CSS animation. It is set to run for a duration of 15 seconds, which of course can be changed, but it could present a bit of a lag for small chunks of text. It is also effectively limited to a single message. So, if you want to play with the technique, I would use the above example first. ... View more

Flash is dead (thank goodness) and I'm afraid there is no reasonable way to convert a SWF to HTML Flash does not use JavaScript. It uses ActionScript, by the way. HTML5, by the way is one of the most misunderstood terms in Web Design. It really is not relevant to what you want to do. I would steer clear of Animate CC and look for a good jQuery news crawler. If you are uncomfortable with code, then I would use a Dreamweaver extension (plugin). ... View more

Gotcha. That's a fairly simple type of widget and can be duplicated with some CSS and JavaScript. We even have a Dreamweaver plugin that will do that in a visual UI. But if you want to try it yourself, Google jQuery News Crawlers. You'll get a bunch to view and they should have instructions for how to get the code into your page. If you want to check ours out, here is a link: Headline Scroller ... View more

Hi Nathan, Post a link to the page in question - with the Flash - so folks can see what kind of animations you are talking about. ... View more

There is no reason why it would not work. You will get much better help from DMX Zone than you will here. I suggest you connect their customer support channel. ... View more

The code is a mess. HTML.com is not a good resource. If you are trying to do an HTML mailer, you need to simplify the code. Do you know how much of your market actually uses Outlook, or is this because you use it yourself? Have you conducted a good testing process, testing a basic structure, then adding to it? Have you checked not just in Outlook, but also with Thunderbird and online Google Mail? Again, the best advice you are going to get can already be discovered in the link I provided and the original answer I gave you. Keep things simple, do not worry about multiple columns, use style attributes directly on the tags in your page instead of embedded in style blocks in the head of your document. And lastly, ignore the articles that advise using tables, font tags, and other assorted archaic methods. Or completely ignore my advice, and do as you please. It's your choice. I do know that our emails work ... View more

I don't want your code. I want to see an actual page online 🙂 That's the only way to do an empirical test. If not, anyone helping you is going to need to copy your code, create a document, and only then be able to give it a thorough test. Curious... how are you testing your work in Outlook? Are you sending yourself emails? ... View more

Post a link to a real test page. ... View more

Actually, it makes perfect sense. Outlook is not a browser. It is a desktop email client, and one that offers very little in the way of support for CSS standards. The good news is that unless you have a very unusual market, the vast majority of your audience will not be using Outlook.. For those who are, simply follow the recommendations I gave you. That's just the way it is, and I'm afraid it is not really an arguable issue. Now, tell me what happens in a desktop browser viewing your page when you make the window narrow? ... View more

Your local and remote servers are set to different root paths. Dreamweaver cannot possibly upload your files to the correct location. Unfortunately, I don't think you got the hint when Anissa and I asked you to post a shot of the panels. So, a little guess work... Change the server setup to point to the folder on your server that actually houses your site. Hint: there will be an index.htm(l) page in the root. ... View more

Post side-by-side screen captures of your Files Panel, showing both the local view and the remote view. ... View more

Just to be clear, there is no default margin or padding assigned to a DIV. ... View more

I am not a Bootstrap fan, so I won't comment on Bootstrap. But the path to the image in the code you posted indicates a problem with your local site definition in Dreamweaver. I am assuming you are using Dreamweaver or you would be posting on a Bootstrap forum of some sort. In any event, a style declaration of max-width 100% is all you need to make an image respond to viewport width. There might be a class you need to assign to your image to make that happen, though. You can try this in your own CSS file: img {max-width: 100%;} As for Bootstrap, there are a couple of regular posters here that swear by it and I'm sure they'll jump in. ... View more

Energize  wrote ... and I'm childish .... Lets just not speak, I'm not wasting my energy, you are always right aren't you after all .... You wont get a repsonse from me again, this forum is cluttered with too many arguments, you are in a lot more of them than me Damn. I thought I was always right. I guess I was wrong. ... View more

I agree with Osgood, and more... There is absolutely no need to minify HTML pages. And minifying JavaScript and CSS files hardly matters and might save you several milliseconds, while making asset management for you more complicated. ... View more

Believe me, there is no party here. If the DWT was well-formed and error free, it should work in CS6. There could be a problem with your site definition or bad code. Can you upload one your bad DWT files and post a link to it? ... View more

I'll just quickly address Aiizaku's​  comment. There is nothing wrong with using tables for data. That's what they are intend for. You just need to keep your code clean and "small" as possible. CSS can do the rest. Since Ben Pleysier chimed in, I'll bow out of this discussion before it turns irrelevant. I'm sure Ben can fix you up just fine. If, however, you are interested in my example, feel free to contact me off the forum. I'm easy to find. ... View more

Every time you bash Bootstrap, you are attacking Dreamweaver that facilitates the library and you are attacking the army of Bootstrap users. I will defend Bootstrap to the hilt each time you bring it down. That's about the most illogical thing I've read in this forum, and that's saying a lot. At least now, if I ever get the opportunity to have Adobe investigate your conspiracy theories and allegations against me and my customers, I can use this. Thank you. And I certainly didn't intend to facilitate the library, whatever that may mean. Bootstrap, in case you didn't know it, was not written by Adobe. And I don't bash it. I just think it's bad code. Are we looking to censor opinions that conflict with yours? Is that how Adobe wants this forum moderated? Seems to me you're being a bully of sorts. But I think your pulpit is made of really weak material. ... View more

I didn't style it very elaborately, but check this out on a small device: http://projectseven.com/testing/adobe-forum/table/ ... View more

Is that the chest beating that are referring to? No. But this is: Regarding this post, I was the first to mark your answer as helpful.  It is your critical attitude of all associated with Bootstrap that I am against. It's also baloney. As is this: All I am asking is that you show some civility towards users and backers of Bootstrap and of Dreamweaver which facilitates the library. If that was all you asked, you would be completed satisfied, and you would not invent elaborate conspiracies to defame me. I really could not are less about how many points I accrue or if my answers are recognized by you as helpful or correct. What does concern me is that you continue to spar with me because my opinion of Bootstrap differs from yours, and still you have not apologized. You know, not a single one of the PVII beta team posts on this forum, and PVII is a company that augments and enhances Dreamweaver. Yet there are testers and promoters of products that compete with Dreamweaver who continue to hide in plain sight here in the arid, abandoned ruins of what was once a vibrant community. Have a charming day. ... View more

A good diagnostician sometimes has to make certain assumptions. All we can do is try. ... View more

Hi Ben, English is my native tongue, but I'm really having a hard time understanding you. The posts on this forum are 5% actual users and 90% chest beating (probably a bad choice of words, but it seems right to me) by the resident choir. If you were referring to the original poster getting a correct diagnosis of his problem... yeah, that happened. But there was only one right answer as far as I could see. What this forum needs is less moderation and more expertise. A lie detector wouldn't hurt, either. Nothing personal... just one man's opinion. ... View more

Yeah. I already suggested contacting the author. Shall we discuss how dangerous Bootstrap can be in the hands of a novice - or right... I almost forgot that's not appropriate in this forum because it's just my uneducated opinion and the conventional wisdom here is that Bootstrap is super duper. The poor Bootstrap team (scattered around the globe as they are) must not have gotten the memo about the pitfalls of position fixed . I can have dinner in peace and with a smile on my lip now . ... View more

The OP's partical code contains errors --  missing </head> and </html> tag.  We have no way of knowing what other errors his code may contain. Here we go . I do believe that the original coder provided 2 logical blocks of code: 1. CSS 2. Markup I might be wrong, but I do not he meant it to be an entire document. ... View more

Al things being equal, Dw CC prefers clean code. Thanks for using my name, but what do errors have to do with this? I prefer clean code, but... well, I guess this is a classic example of how threads on this forum go off on tangents Nice fonts and colors, by the way. Are those default? I've never seen such a thing in Dreamweaver 19 (just kidding, no need to answer). ... View more

It also works in an error free document within 2019.  Not sure what the "error free" reference means. So, to get links to work in Live View 2019 you have to enable something that you don't need to in CS6? Forgive the question, but I use Creative Cloud apps very infrequently. Only to test our extensions, actually. ... View more

That's beyond the scope of what a public user forum is designed for.  If you have a specific question, the volunteers here are usually happy to try & help.   But don't ask us to rebuild your code.  That's something you need to learn to do or hire somebody to do it for you. Not sure I agree. Helping people is sometimes a nice thing to do. I wouldn't suggest recoding an entire site, but fixing a page is not beyond my scope. ... View more

Just an FYI, but the original poster's actual posted code, when placed in a new document in Dreamweaver CS6, works in Live View Just saying. ... View more

If you set up Dreamweaver Preview In Browser then all it takes is F-12 and some habit-changing muscle memory. I've been using Dreamweaver for 22 years. It's up to you, but it's pretty much a foregone conclusion that relying on Dreamweaver's Live View can be harmful to one' sanity I'd give Adobe 5-10 years to get Live View "optimized". But you are the captain of your ship. ... View more