danirevis
New Here
danirevis
New Here
Activity
‎Mar 29, 2023
02:50 PM
Thank you very much. The other stock service that accepted them was ShutterStock, which has a background of accepting me lees photos than Adobe, thats why it shocked me. After having a look at your suggestions I have a doubt. What should I change if I want to make a low light scenario of a model studing at nigth? The low light atmosphere is already in my pics, and the quality I would say its not that bad. Thank you again. Best, Dani.
... View more
‎Mar 29, 2023
09:42 AM
Hi, I have done a session with my model studying at dusk and at night in a room, so the images don't have too much light, and have been rejected with the following explanation: "Common problems that can affect the technical quality of images include exposure problems, artistic flou, excessive filtering or artifacts/noise." These photos were accepted in other agencies that are known to be very restrictive with no problems. I find the photos are not overedited, they don't have noise and the luminosity of the scene is the corresponding one to the idea I want to transmit. Thank you in advance!
... View more
‎Mar 29, 2023
07:17 AM
Hi,
I have done a session with my model studying at dusk and at night in a room, so the images don't have too much light, and have been rejected with the following explanation: "Common problems that can affect the technical quality of images include exposure problems, artistic flou, excessive filtering or artifacts/noise."
These photos were accepted in other agencies that are known to be very restrictive with no problems. All the authomatic arguments they give to explain why they were rejected doesn't make sense to me, since the photos were not overedited, they don't have noise and the luminosity of the scene is the corresponding one to the idea I want to transmit.
I would like to know what to change and why they have been rejected in order to make them accepted.
I share with you some of the photos.
Thank you in advance!
... View more