Skip to main content
Inspiring
December 30, 2017
Question

Advice on Computer Build for Premiere Pro/After Effects

  • December 30, 2017
  • 1 reply
  • 5150 views

Hello!

I am putting together the specifications of a new computer for running Adobe software, primarily Premiere Pro and After Effects. I'm trying to put together a well-balanced, stable machine for editing 1080HD H264 videos, while having the option to work with 4K in limited amounts if needed down the road.

Basically, I'm looking for something solid that will be able to edit multi-layered 1080 projects with some effects added without dropping frames, but I don't want to go overboard on a machine that offers way more power than I intend to use. Does this build look like a nice balance? Let me know what you think!

Intel Core i7 i7-8700K

ASUS TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Desktop Motherboard

Corsair RMx Series RM750x - 750 Watt 80 PLUS Gold Certified Fully Modular PSU

Corsair Hydro Series H60 High Performance Liquid CPU Cooler

Corsair Vengeance LPX 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4 DRAM 2400MHz (PC4-19200) C14 Memory Kit

EVGA GeForce GTX 1060 Graphic Card - 1.51 GHz Core - 1.71 GHz Boost Clock - 6 GB GDDR5

Samsung 850 EVO 250 GB 2.5" Internal Solid State Drive

          (for operating system and software)

WD Black 512GB Performance SSD - 8 Gb/s M.2 2280 PCIe NVMe Solid State Drive

          (for media, cache, etc.)

Thanks!

    This topic has been closed for replies.

    1 reply

    Trevor.Dennis
    Community Expert
    Community Expert
    December 31, 2017

    If you look through recent forum posts, you'll find that we liked the 8700K because of its low cost and high clock speed, but we recently realized that it is limited to 16 PCIe lanes.  That will compromise its storage capability and how many M.2 and SATA ports it can support, and limit the number of memory slots. 

    If you don't think you'll need to expand on storage down the road, then the 8700K is as fast as anything for Photoshop and After Effects, but not quite so good for Premiere Pro which is able to make use of multiple cores and threads.

    It would be crazy to build a new NLE system nowadays without making use of the incredibly fast NVMe SSDs that can move 3.5Gb/s continuous.  This makes raid0 arrays redundant.  You can use the same drive for cache, and project files with bandwidth to spare.  So perhaps a decent SSD for OS and program files.  I am not familiar with the M.2 drive on your list.  The Samsung 960 Pro and EVO are more popular here.  I am using a pair of Samsung 960PRO 512Gb NVMe drives for the build I am waiting for, and will add a number of Samsung SSDs from an earlier build, as well as USB3 external HDDs for backup and archive.

    The people who know a lot more than me on this forum, might tell you to go up a step with that GPU.  We'll wait for Bill etc. to contribute and say whether a GTX1070 might be a better fit.

    I don't know what to say about the 8700K.  Z370 systems are so much cheaper to build than X299 or even Threadripper X399.  I don't know a lot about Ryzen.  The 1800X is cheaper than the 8700K, and other build costs would be similar, but the Ryzen 1800X has 24PCIe lanes.  I'd suggest looking though the Puget System benchmarks that will compare those CPUs and systems directly, and with the applications that interest you.

    This is for Premiere Pro

    I see the $500 Ryzen 1800X is a wee bit behind the $360 8700K when rendering, which tends to use all the cores/and threads available to it.  So clock speed is still the telling factor, even with two less cores.

    If you read the article and others that cover more CPUs, you'll see that the much more expensive high end i9X and threadripper builds are noticeably faster for Premiere Pro, but that the 8700K will knock their socks off with more lightly threaded applications like Photoshop and After Effects.

    https://www.pugetsystems.com/all_articles.php

    Bill Gehrke
    Inspiring
    December 31, 2017

    I agree with Trevor on the M.2 chioce.  For only $40 more you can have the Samsung 960 EVO which has several times more performance then that WD.

    I have a question on that ASUS TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING board.  With only a 16 lane CPU when you use the M.2 connector does that reduce the GPU from x16 to x8?  I looked at the ASUS spec and could not determine what the answer woulf be, maybe they are hiding the aqnswer other motherboards even ASUS usually give you the data versus how many lanes the CPU has.

    On the GPU, I have tested the GTX 1060 and the GTX 1080 in my true desktop computer and find very little difference between the two take a look at the data for your self  My PPBM test has two GPU accelerated tests, the extreme test is a specially design GPU intense export of the MPEG2-DVD timeline while the export of the H.264 timeline is a seven layer multimedia timeline. But notice that generally the GTX 10 series can easily have Memory Clock speed raised significantly that improves the CUDA performance and it reqires no other adjustments and I consider it very safe. My laptop the Memory Clock is 50% faster than stock and since I most always operate with it plugged into the AC power I really am notv worried about Battery life.

    CPU==Since I found that processor only has 16 lanes I also am soured on it unless some motherboard chip sets offer additional lanes???  Maybe I will have to call ASUS next week.

    I never have used anything but air cooling.

    Legend
    December 31, 2017

    Bill,

    Read my clarified response above with regards to how the mainstream CPU platform is configured. There, you will find that the mainstream CPUs actually provide more than 16 PCIe lanes - but the extras above 16 are assigned to be sent to the PCH and not directly to any slot. As a result, with the i7-8700K, one can have a discrete GPU plus a combination of PCIe devices that consume up to eight PCIe lanes total.