Build Worth the upgrade: is this worth it for video editing.

[Cross Aerial Photography]

I run a aerial photography business and do alot of 4k 60 fps editing and rendering out effects in Premiere Pro and After Effects. I edit currently on my laptop but will be switching over to a new system. I want to know:

1) What can I expect from a new system?

2) Should I upgrade my GPU?

Here are the towers specs:

MOBO: ASrock Pro 4

CPU: i5-3570k

GPU: Powercolor R9 290 PCS+

PSU: CX750M

RAM: 8Gb of Corsair Vengeance

Case: HAF 932 advanced

Laptop:

CPU: 2.6 GHz Core i7 6700HQ

GPU: NVIDIA GTX970M 3GB GDDR5

RAM: 16 GB DDR4-SDRAM

So for the upgrade, I am thinking this:

MOBO: ASUS Prime X370-Pro

CPU: Ryzen 1700

GPU: 1070 or keep current GPU

PSU: CX750M

RAM: G.SKILL Ripjaws V Series 32GB (2 x 16GB) DDR4 2400 (PC4 19200)

Case: HAF 932 advanced or something smaller

So what upgrades can I expect? I am tired of long render times.

[Moderator note: moved to best forum, title edited for best response]

[excited_Genie16B8]

I personally would stick with Intel/nVidia for an Adobe edit system.

[Cross Aerial Photography]

On paper, I agree. But in real world performance, the Ryzen series outperforms Intel in most categories, especially budget. The Intel 6900K, a +$1000 CPU barely beats the Ryzen 1700. So the Ryzen is going to be my CPU.

The debate comes from what to use for my GPU. Again, I know using nVidea means you can use CUDA but from the test I have seen, there is not appreciable difference. Right now, I am looking at 4 options:

Keep my 290

Upgrade to 480

Wait to see what the new 500 series offers

Get a 1070

[excited_Genie16B8]

in real world performance, the Ryzen series outperforms

It's not really about that.  It's about Adobe software specifically having a history of issues with AMD hardware that just don't exist with Intel/nVidia.

[Cross Aerial Photography]

Could you provide some examples? Im not trying to smart a**, just really want do my research.

[excited_Genie16B8]

I go through a LOT of posts, the specifics don't always stick.

The best I can suggest is a forum search.

[R Neil Haugen]

Adobe's video programs especially are optimized for the Nvidia CUDA architecture. They do work with OpenCL and all, sorta mostly ... but there are a lot more issues it seems with the AMD cards. My builder used to try to make the AMD work because in most outside-of-Adobe stuff, from video players to gaming, the AMD cards give good value per buck.

However ... he couldn't get an AMD setup to work as well as "it should!" ... and as Jim notes, builds me Nvidia based rigs now.

Bill Gehrke​ has the hard data on the real-world working within Adobe programs. And there's several others that reply here a lot that have great knowledge and experience also.

Past that, reading through the threads on this forum will give you a lot of information.

Neil

[smm4774]

For 4k work, you may consider 64gb of ram, 128 if you're doing a lot of AE work.  I've been researching too and that advice seems to be consistent although I have no data to point to.

If 10 bit color is important to you, you'll need an Nvidia Quadro card but most people take the power of the Geforce cards in 8 bit for the price.  My suggestion would be, buy the Nvidia card with a pascal processor and the most cuda cores you can afford and consider the black magic 4K intensity pro card to feed a 10 bit monitor if you need it.

Blackmagic Design: Intensity Pro 4K

good luck.

[excited_Genie16B8]

If 10 bit color is important to you, you'll need an Nvidia Quadro card

That's not quite accurate.  The Quadros will offer 10 bit output for monitoring, but aren't needed to import, edit or export 10 bit (or higher) video.

But I do feel that using a dedicated I/O card is the better way to go here, as they take the software, GPU driver and OS out of the signal path, ensuring a proper, unaltered signal to the monitor.

[RjL190365]

Here's the deal with AMD GPUs in Premiere Pro:

Although the latest CC versions of Premiere Pro support OpenCL in it's MPE GPU acceleration renderer OpenCL feature support is less complete than that of the CUDA support. But only Nvidia GPUs support CUDA. As a result, the performance scores with GPU-accelerated renders with an AMD GPU are quite a bit slower (or longer) than they should have been.

And the AMD Ryzen platform has great potential. The limitations of only dual-channel DDR4 RAM operation and a maximum RAM limit of only 64GB are serious issues for professional video editors.

[Cross Aerial Photography]

I can agree that AMD GPU may need to be avoided, I will most likely get a 1070. That will do everything I want it to do and more. As for the Ryzen, there is no debate. I can upgrade my system to a ryzen, 32 GB of ram, and get a 1070 for cheaper than just the Intel CPU the ryzen contest with.

[Guest]

When it comes to using Adobe Products you always get what you pay for. Cutting cost keeps you at the crash gate all the time and you will always blame the software.

[excited_Genie16B8]

There have been issues in the past with PP not being able to run using an AMD CPU, whereas Intel CPUs didn't have the issue.  Old posts will have the details.

Something to consider.