Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hi,
fessing up that I am clueless when it comes to computers and what is needed for video editing (the last time i edited anything was 24 odd years ago on a i mac). I have been asked by some clients to make some tuitional videos and I haven't a clue what specs I need when it comes to a PC. My current PC is about 10 years old and wont handle Premier Pro (which I have as part of my Adobe Package).
I have been to my local independent shop who quoted £2500 to build me one (my financier and wife) says for that price it had better be able to travel in space and time.
I then checked with my local PCworld Curries and have these specs. And I have absolutley no idea as to whether they are good enough to edit video or not. My video will be either shot on a Canon R7 and a DJI Osmo Pocket 3 both using 4K
Any help would be greatly appreciated. My budget is approx £1000
Specs:
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
If going with AMD, a Ryzan 7 would be a better choice than a Ryzen 5.
I'd also go with 64 GB RAM.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Thanks for the information Peru Bob. I figured that the RAM was on the light side and if I went ahead with this PC was going to buy and install an additional 32GB but on your recommendation I will up that to 48GB. I have found a AMD Ryzan 7 but it is a little over my budget, especially with the extra RAM. Big learning curve this, I learned to edit with two video cassettes and a jog shuttle #feeling old.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
That Ryzen 5 5500 is a poor choice for video editing by current standards: It is not a true Ryzen 5000-series CPU per se, but is instead a gimped APU with its integrated GPU disabled, only PCIe 3.0 support (versus PCIe 4.0 on the non-APU Ryzen 5000-series CPUS) and only 16 MB of L3 cache (and again, the non-APU Ryzen 5000 CPUs have four times more L3 cache than the APUs), which will bottleneck the performance of that RTX 4060 which absolutely requires full PCIe 4.0 support to avoid an interface-induced bottleneck as it utilizes only eight of the 16 PCIe lanes. The end result is a system that actually performs worse than a quad-core CPU that's a CPU generation older. As such, it should not have been labeled a Ryzen 5 5500 at all, but a Ryzen 5 5600GF instead as it is essentially a Ryzen 5 5600G with its iGPU disabled.
Unfortunately, the 5500 is also in no-man's land because it requires a relatively expensive higher-end GPU (I'm looking at you, the RTX 4070 SUPER) just to minimize that PCIe-induced GPU bottleneck, and then you'd end up with the exact opposite problem (too much GPU and not enough CPU). As currently configured, that RTX 4060 would utilize only eight PCIe 3.0 lanes on your planned CPU (whereas the RTX 4060 itself is wired for eight PCIe 4.0 lanes), while the 4070 utilizes all 16 PCIe lanes (thus making it much less vulnerable to PCIe clock speed deficiencies).
So, if you get that particular AM4 platform, see if you can get a Ryzen 5 5600 (make sure that the 5600 CPU does not have a "G" anywhere in its model number) instead of that planned 5500 (and remember, the 5600 and the 5500 are of two completely different microarchitectures). And if you do go Ryzen 7, don't pick the plain non-X 5700 as it is like your planned 5500 – a gimped APU rather than a true 5000 series CPU.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Thanks for the reply, I think I understand:
How about this one:
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
That's better, if that's all you can afford. Its overall performance would be roughly on par with that of my secondary mini-ITX build that's equipped with a Ryzen 5 7600X and only a Radeon RX 6700XT GPU; however, you do gain AV1 hardware encoding support if you're planning to use software that supports such encoding like DaVinci Resolve. Otherwise, for that amount of money you probably would've ended up with a grossly mismatched setup in terms of the relative component performance balance (either too little CPU or too little GPU).
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I remember a VERY long time in the past filming on 8mm 'tape' and editing was cutting and gluing parts together to put on a reel to use with a mechanical projector
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
That reminds me of when I was learning radio broadcasting with reel to reel machines for editing jingles, (that was 30 years ago). Amazing how technology has moved a long, pity my knowledge has failed to keep up.