PC Spec good enough for PS, LR classic and LRcc?

[Simon32790377rzzm]

Hi

I'm looking to get a new PC. Will the spec below give me a smooth and fast user experience with Photoshop, LR and LR classic? I'm a hobbyist photographer working with stills. My current set up is an old laptop - fine for light edits in Lightroom CC, but not for anything more heavy duty.

Thanks 

Intel i5-12400f CPU

32GB DDR4 3600Mhz ram

1TB Corsair MP600 M.2 NVME SSD

Nvidia RTX 3050 graphics card

[kglad · Accepted solution]

yes.

https://helpx.adobe.com/creative-cloud/system-requirements.html

====================================

in the future, to find the best place to post your message, use the list here, https://community.adobe.com/

p.s. i don't think the adobe website, and forums in particular, are easy to navigate, so don't spend a lot of time searching that forum list. do your best and we'll move the post (like this one has already been moved) if it helps you get responses.

<"moved from using the community">

[John T Smith · Accepted solution]

>Nvidia RTX 3050

Be sure you use the STUDIO driver, not the GAMING driver

Do not count on Windows to be fully up to date when it comes to device drivers
Go to the vendor site to be sure you have an updated driver for your graphic adapter
.
nVidia Driver Downloads https://www.nvidia.com/Download/index.aspx?lang=en-us
-for all Adobe programs use the STUDIO driver, not the GAMING driver
-To achieve the highest level of reliability, Studio Drivers undergo extensive
-testing against multi-app creator workflows and multiple revisions of the top
-creative applications from Adobe to Autodesk and beyond

[Simon32790377rzzm]

Thanks. I'm now all set up with the new system, works fine. Appreciate the response.

[kglad]

enjoy!

[RjL190365]

As kglad stated, yes. Those programs rely much more on single-threaded performance to begin with, so you don't necessarily need a CPU with a higher core count to run those photo editing programs well. And those programs don't utilize the GPU much, so even that RTX 3050 would suffice.

If there is one thing that I would have changed, it would have been the RAM. We are at the point where even the fastest DDR4 RAM is now beginning to hold back the overall performance of the newer Intel CPUs. As equipped, that 12th-Gen i5 with 6 cores and 12 threads (and in this CPU, only the P-cores are enabled while all of the E-cores are disabled during CPU manufacture) does not perform appreciably better than the previous-gen 11th-Gen i5 to justify the added cost. And given that these days DDR5-4800 RAM barely costs more money than an equivalent amount of DDR4-3200 RAM, choosing DDR5 instead of DDR4 RAM would now boil down to the cost difference between the DDR5 and DDR4 versions of the same motherboard.

Oh, by the way, enjoy that new system!