Well, I have answered that. the second time I answer you, it got deleted. But I noted again, that you clearly don't understand how pro work and yet you again claimed as professionals. If one work in this field, at least he should know where he get his footage from, and where he should send his work to, and understand his work area. And I note again that Premiere is at Pro to Consumer stage product. Therefore it is a consumer product. And no.. we don't work for our consumers to watch our movie. We work so that Universal Pictures agrees to import our footage into their Premiere Pro and distribute them so that you can watch them. It's THEIR work, not ours. Where do they want to deliver, be it BBC, DVD, or anything, it's up to them. They paid us, and after we send our work, they advertise, create trailers, and many things from our work using Premiere Pro for consumers. We sit, enjoy, and wait. Therefore, again, it is consumer product.
I am not the editor, so yes, I am not familiar. But.. well, speaking avenger, can you mixed multiple framerate shots into 1 timeline with premiere pro then apply another effect filter in different framerate? Or perhaps combine 2 kind of overlapping frames in different rate by masking them? Say.. 25fps background with 480fps foreground perhaps? Add another animated 3D actor in 30 fps 3D render scene modified to 480fps to accompany that 480fps foreground sequence? Then render them in 29.97 film? Oh.. I forgot.. Premiere Pro can't import 3D files. May be in your term Calculus is not basic, but in our area, calculus is something that goes without saying. You haven't seen what other movie editor software can do. Avenger was hard to make, yes.. but only a routine work.
Want to know our work? Consider this. Lasso a tree at 25fps background and replace it with a live 30fps sequence, then add a 30fps animated sequence then within 3 secs climbing gradually to 120fps, kicking it in slow motion, then just before the kick connects goes back to 30fps to let the tree shakes. Then render them in 29.97 film. Avenger? Maybe I can hear some complaints for something like that, but clearly not from editors. Avenger is harder to make, but that's not work for movie editors. Those are for 3D maker. They deliver the finished scene to us to merge with other clips. And those routines combining them are pretty basic. As for the one kicking the trees, those responsible to make that animation and effects are the one that suffers, not the editors. Same thing goes for those explosions and effects. We can't expect for Adobe Premiere or any movie editor softwares to have that kind of effects, can we? I they can't, we have to create. And again, that's not editors' job.
May be, BBC are professionals, but again, they are pro to consumer. And maybe, in their field, Premiere is better suited. But clearly not ours.
And if you are profesional enough, or want to become one, one thing you have to understand and remember in your every being, is that you HAVE TO work with other people in their respective field. Editing something to produce movie like Avenger is a stupid idea. You need to GENERATE some scenes, not to EDIT them. And that's definitely not your work. That why we are called profesionals. On the other hand, I do help both division since I am in charge of both their equipment, and I can't let them tinkering my equipment because I am a pro in my own field. A real Pro wouldn't step on other Pro's shoes.
174
Replies
AdChoices