Sure thing!
As discussed in this other article:
https://www.computerworld.com/article/3597949/everything-you-need-to-know-about-rosetta-2-on-apple-silicon-macs.html
Some apps may be native to Apple Silicon chips such as, Adobe Acrobat.
But that doesn't mean that the compiled binaries that are needed to install a program on a Silicon-powered macOS ( after it is downloaded ) are native to that processor architechture.
Note also, and a very important detail, that the author of the article outlines the problems that may arise with programs that are dependent of dynamic JavaScript code (which will and may run slow on a Apple Silicon microprocessor architecture.).
In which case, Rosetta2 serves as an emulator to close that gap.
I am not a macOS user, I am somewhat familiarized with it, but I've been testing Linux operating system distributions successfully on many different types of PC architectures that were originally intended for Microsoft Windows since 1997 (and I've also used Linux OS on Apple hardware -- for educational purposes).
In order to compile custom-made software for a particular piece of hardware architecture, the Linux OS offers limitless flexibility, but the same is not true with Apple hardware and software.
Apple restricts its user base with very tight licensing.
In which case, tampering with the Apple hardware device, or messing with the macOS (that was designed for that particular Apple hardware), leaves the user with nothing else but to try installing Rosetta. Which is the legal alternative to begin with and it is fully supported by Apple themselves.
From that Point of View, if I was a macOS user having your same issue on a Silicon Apple device, it makes sense to me to install Rosetta2 and give it a shot.
... View more