I know you are only support, and I am grateful anyone actually answers our questions here. I just think there is a fundamental lack of understanding the kind of work professionals do. Not everyone works in 30 second spots, or music videos. For years adobe wanted to attract the Long form editors. That includes Documentaries and Feature Films. I am lucky enough to be one of those editors. I have spent years slogging my way from AVID, to EDIT, to SpeedRazor (yeah I said it), Back to AVID, to Final Cut, to Smoke , and to Premiere. The Key to anything in all of this is organization. Currently I have a Documentary with approximately 540 hours of footage and more titles and graphics than anyone should be allowed, and A Feature Film with 11.5 TB of Footage and consisting of about 2500 shots. Efficiency in managing this is the only way it works. I rely heavily on my assistant to get everything I need for a scene in bins correctly. My Project windows are a textbook example for hyper organization. When a director calls for a shot I have it right there and I don't have to go searching for it. It's these basic fundamentals we do not need adobe leaving out of products. It's what turned everyone off from Final Cut X. I was happy to find adobe re writing the Inscriber cousin that is Legacy Title. (Inscriber is a title tool going all the way back to the targa Framebuffer) Lord knows the title tool needs animation, and a method for sending it to After effects. Just make it an asset in the project that we can easily get to and change. there is no such thing as a next title tool unless we go back to the method of holding a single track for graphics like the old Premiere did with 2 video tracks and a graphics track. Kevin
... View more