Thank you for the comments! I will go through everything that the two of you listed, and then get back to you. Hopefully one of these options will wind up being my solution. ... View more

Thank you for the information! I did not know that. ;- ) I attached the pictures of my settings. I was kind of confused by them, to be honest. The layout to Speedgrade is much different than Premiere Pro... What could I do to make a better video file here...? ... View more

Alright. I can wait until then if anything. thank you very much! Tomorrow I will take a screenshot of my settings, and post it here. I am willing to export the files in Cineform instead of the MOV files if it really is a better option? I was only trying to use the MOV because that is the file that the NIKON D3400 creates and I thought that Speedgrade would've handled the conversion faster that way (which obviously was not the case!), but it is not important, so I could try exporting in Cineform. ... View more

Yes, I tried making my own preset, and found one for .MOV, and yet I got the same result. The file was 250GB and would not open in any media player. QuickTime was installed, that was the format used , and before importing the files into speedgrade , everything was working great. Is exporting files out of speedgrade not something you would usually do? I do not understand why this is so difficult for me. ... View more

Thank you Nancy. That was the answer I was hoping to hear, honestly. It would be a much greater hassle trying to put together two separate websites. I had been trying to find a solution for my client's problem here, for months. I finally convinced them to use a fully responsive design, and so long as media queries really are the best option, then I will be going with that. It is a better user experience. Thank you again Nancy, through the most of my topics, you have seemed to be the only one who understood exactly what I was trying to do! ... View more

For real, Nancy, all I can do is laugh at this point. I wasn't trying to cause a problem. As far as coding goes, trust me, you are certainly more knowledgeable than I am, and I do trust your experience is far more than mine. However, undermining my "taste of art", which I'm sure I have been doing longer than you have, coding or not, which is irrelevant either way, is what is making this far less professional than it needs to be. I call myself a beginner, but as far as that is concerned, I am a beginner to this specific topic. Responsive web design. I have been "coding" for a while, and I understand the concept. I have done styling, designing, and everything necessary to gain a good foundation in this field. I came here to learn. I came here to learn from people who know more than me. I can take your advice and your constructive criticism, but I will not tolerate being insulted. Not even in a passive sense, as I can see what your implications are. In my last topic, Nancy, you were one of the more helpful users, and the first one to understand what my intention was. I would rather not have a problem with you. I like using Dreamweavr, and it has more functions than a website builder and Muse is capable of. I wish to learn. If you want to teach me the proper ways to do everything, and what a more professional site would be like, than feel free, but as you said, it would take hours of tutorials would it not? You told me the forum wasn't the place to learn responsive design in your first post, so where do you recommend that I go? I will attempt the code you provided os_good. I will return with the results. hopefully that is something that will suffice. I am starting to look into some other "responsive/bootstrap" possibilities as well. I am a very fast learner, all I need  is someone willing to teach me. ... View more

We will agree to disagree, Nancy, this isn't going anywhere. I completely disagree with your analogy, I do not think it fits what I am implying whatsoever. Yes, obviously, you build a structure first, but in this particular situation, the "structure" is not really representative of "a room." I am a designer. I'm not a coder, but a designer. Trust me, I know what art is. The code seemed to work for what I was going for. Could you further explain how I would swap out an image. What I would do with my website is this... On a desktop I would have a banner, but I would probably switch that out for another image that fits better than Nancy's above example, or simply get rid of the banner altogether, as it doesn't add anything to the experience, other than something to scroll past on the mobile. How could I do this? ... View more

I actually do not understand, Nancy... I have seen absolutely horrid responsive designs akin to what you are showing me. A website can benefit from artistic talent and creativity just as much as responsive design, I suppose... The worst part I can see is the banner image on the mobile layout. Bigger text would accommodate some of the terrible design on the desktop. Being creative is my intention. ... View more

I will try out that code, and I will come back with the results. This will cause the website to be responsive on mobile and otherwise, correct? At least in theory? ... View more

That is not entirely true... Weebly allows you to edit their HTML/CSS in full. Unless you mean something else, but you have complete access to that, and the ability to export your site. I have played with that before, and it makes too much of a mess with Dreamweaver, but from what I tested it is very possible. I don't have that code, outside of my last topic where we left off. As far as we need to be concerned, I have an image of 1920x1080 dimensions, and plain simple text. When taken to the internet, it displays naturally at a 1920 x 1080 ratio. I can zoom in and it gets bigger. I can zoom out and it gets smaller. It does not do any adjusting whatsoever. A basic Dreamweaver HTML file with a 1920 x 1080 image inserted, and a paragraph of text beneath that. ... View more

I think there must be a misunderstanding here. From what I have heard/seen, this is really not that difficult at all. Difficult for me to understand, yes, but not for someone who knows what they are doing and can teach me. Online web builders such as Wix and Weebly have easily accomplished what I am talking about, but I want to try this myself, as I do not trust such website builders servers. Why would it look terrible on ultra wide displays? Could you give me an example...? ... View more

This is probably my fault somehow, but when I send the HTML page I made, to my phone, it doesn't do anything. it says... HEADER FOOTER and an "X" for the image. Did I need to do more than just paste the code into an HTML document? I'm on Android 5.1. ... View more

On google chrome, the image does not shrink down to the smallest window size, and although in Firefox it does, the image's zoom starts over again. On IE 11 it shrinks all the way down, but again, once the image reaches the borders of the window, it stops growing. You definitely understand what I am trying to do, though. ... View more

I will check that and get back to you in a little bit. I'm sorry again, like I said earlier I am by no means a coder, I'm a designer, visually speaking, so this is confusing to me. There is stuff that I know, and I can pick up on certain things, but overall simple descriptions would help best. Thank you again...! ... View more

I pasted that code into a blank HTML document (which is what I was supposed to do, right?), and for some reason in both chrome and Firefox, this is what I got... ... ... The image doubles up on regular zoom, and is no longer responsive. Did I do something wrong...? Its the same in IE 11, too. ... View more

Alright, I believe you do understand what I'm trying to do, unfortunately it didn't completely work. For whatever reason it did continue zooming in on Firefox and chrome, but once we got to a certain point they reset back to being fixed with the screen/window's width and then kept zooming again, but less afterwards. 0_O Also, unfortunately, IE 11 is also a necessary thing to figure out too. Thank you for your continued help. ... View more

I'm checking if your code works now, I think you do have the right idea Osgood_, I'll let you know in a little bit. ... View more

I did, and what seemed to happen was quite close to what I was describing, but if you zoom in enough (remember that IE 11,Chrome, etc., usually get to %1000 zoom) the image stops growing. in fact, once the image  reaches the boundaries of the maximized IE window it stops growing upon zooming in. I changed the "width" to "max-width" and the "100%" to "10000" and the image continued to grow in size, but di not continue being responsive to resizing the window, again, after a certain point. I'm not sure why that is...? ... View more

2 + 2 - 1 = 6 is basically what I am hearing from pziecina and yourself right now. I am not trying to be mean here, but the only one who has seemed to understand at least a little bit what I am saying is Nancy. I'm not sure how to simplify this any further... First of all, I never said anything about the text whatsoever. I do not want to restrict the text size upon zooming, and nothing I am trying to do goes against any kind of web design "practice", except "partially" the images, but that is something that no user will see happen until they zoom in, mobile or not. Simplified... I want (or the person I'm doing this for, actually wants) the website to be a responsive site. Your average responsive site with no text restrictions (...0_O...) and no peculiar design strategy outside of the norm. What I do want is that when you have a fully maximized window on your desktop. Your web browser will allow you to zoom in on said webpage, expanding the image beyond its actual dimensions (like your web browser would allow you to do if you opened any JPG, PNG, GIF, whatever) with everything else continuing to be responsive and fit into the screen as it would (however, again, allowing the text to grow as much as it wants as it usually would) and that is all I need this site to do, "breaking" only one "rule", which is actually irrelevant to anything outside of the web browsers ability to zoom in. Again, I'm not trying to be mean or offensive, its just that what I want is so simple, yet no one understands what it is I'm asking, even though we are using a forum that abides these rules, and most websites on the internet do exactly what I am referring to, responsive design and all... ... View more

Alright, putting this... @charset "utf-8"; img { max-width: 10000%; min-width: 100% } ...as my CSS when making a responsive image for whatever reason allowed me to use IE 11's zoom function to close up on the image (I believe being attributed to the exaggerated 10,000%). In fact, even when resizing the browser window (emulating a mobile device) it kept its responsive attributes, resizing down with the window. It did, only to a point however. For some reason, when I shrink the window down to its absolute minimum width, eventually it does begin cutting off the picture. In theory, if I could stop that from happening, it would probably solve any issues, but honestly, I got around to that randomly taking educated guesses about the code, and I don't fully understand what is actually going on, and if this is in anyway an appropriate fix for this. ... View more

As simply as I can think to describe it, is that I need my images to "react" when I use IE 11 "zoom in" function. ...Or any other web browser obviously. Even on a responsive website like Apple's, I can use the above function to zoom in on a page, and while the text and icons and everything will re-order itself, they won't stay the same human-visual size. If I zoom in enough, they will begin to exit the screen, and I won't be able to see the entire image, without zooming back out, or a scroll bar... although apple's image just gets cut out of the screen, there are other sites, where a scroll bar will eventually appear. Not on mobile, but for a desktop. ... View more

I'm trying do it the other way around? I actually want ​the images size to increase, the problem is that they will not when I zoom in. I want them to be responsive for mobile devices, but their size will still increase when zooming in. ... View more

Alright, for the record, the way this site is built is not up to me, I'm not the one making the decisions. Yes, a responsive design is indeed better globally, there is no denying that, and I never did. What is mainly required of me, however, is that I make the images not fixed to the screen going upwards. Even on apple's website, while it is responsive as you said Nancy, when I use "ctrl +" the images will still become larger on the screen, not fixing its dimensions. In Dreamweaver, using a responsive design template, like the bootstrap, it forces images to always appear the same size. That feature is what I need to rid of somehow, like all of these seemingly responsive websites can apparently do. If I can pull that off, I will probably be able to convince the one making the decisions that a responsive design will work. ... View more

"If you have to ask, you cannot do it" is complete and total rubbish, I am sorry to say. To clarify what I want to do. Visit this site on your desktop. Then visit it on your mobile. Nothing changes, it just shrinks. Is this possible? Serebii.net - Where Legends Come To Life ... View more