Skip to main content
Participant
July 26, 2011

P: Enable/Disable Library Filters not working properly

  • July 26, 2011
  • 22 replies
  • 747 views

I am running LR 3.4.1 on OS X 10.6.8. The Library>Enable Filters command does not work properly when I have a Library Filter set up to filter on more than on criterion.

For example, I have a Library Filter preset called "Needs Location Keywords" that selects all images for which don't have "Location" as one of their keywords and which are not flagged as Rejected. In other words, there are two filter criteria applied:

1) TEXT: Keywords "Don't Contain" "Location"
2) ATTRIBUTE: Flag = Flagged OR Flag = Unflagged

Toggling the Filter State by choosing Library>Enable Filters works as desired when the Filter State is changed to OFF; all images in the selected folder are displayed. However, when Library>Enable Filters is selected a second time, changing the Filter State back to ON, only one of the original filter criteria is applied, namely:

1) TEXT: Keywords "Don't Contain" "Location"

However, ATTRIBUTE Filtering is NOT re-enabled as one would expect.

This is repeatable with different filter settings and different folders.

This topic has been closed for replies.

22 replies

kevinyank
Participating Frequently
July 26, 2017
Well that didn't last long. After being fixed in 2015.9, this is now broken again as of 2015.10.1. 😞
kevinyank
Participating Frequently
March 22, 2017
Oh my goodness, it’s fixed!

I’d given up hope! Thank you so much. 🙂
Smit K
Participating Frequently
March 22, 2017
Hi Kevin/Michael,

Could you try Lightroom 6.9/ CC 2015.9?

Thanks,
Smit Keniya
Smit | Lightroom Team
kevinyank
Participating Frequently
January 8, 2017
Bug still present in 2015.8.
m_pollackAuthor
Participant
July 21, 2016
I still see this bug, too. So much for it being written up in the bug database. It makes you wonder how many other unsolved bugs are on that list.
kevinyank
Participating Frequently
July 16, 2016
5 years later, still seeing this bug in Lightroom 2015.6. It’s a shame; toggling library filters on and off would be a really handy feature if it worked.
Known Participant
April 2, 2016
I found this board and post because I don't understand why "no filers" and "all filers off" aren't the exact same thing.
Participating Frequently
August 17, 2011
This forum system is relatively new (to us) and I've been keeping a list of capabilities I'd like to see added. I just added "ability to easily track threads needing a follow up reply" to the list. So with luck, the answer won't be "no" forever.

Thanks,
Ben
m_pollackAuthor
Participant
August 17, 2011
"Try it again and see? :-)"

I thought you might say that. I just wondered if there was a way for users to see the status of documented bugs. Your reply lets me know that the answer is "no". Thanks for clarifying.
Participating Frequently
August 17, 2011
Try it again and see? 🙂 If I'm really on the ball, I'll post back to this thread to confirm that it's been fixed, but there's not an easy way for me to track threads that need replies, so I wouldn't rely on that. Dot releases (i.e., 3.3, 3.4, etc.) are accompanied by release notes that describe most of the bugs that have been fixed in that release, although typically full releases (2.0, 3.0, etc.) only include descriptions of new features.

-Ben