P: Generated images violate user guidelines

forbids me to change my OWN pictures in firefly!  - Worthless!!!

I often get these guideline problems and I have no idea why.  Can they add more details on why this was a violation?  I just clicked generate without adding any text.

Here's a new one. I had myself saved as the subject and typed colorful shirt. I was amazed to get THIS error. Sorry We don't recognise your language as English, please try again. I mean I even spelt Colorful the American way to help the Bot understand ROFLPSML

The AI is why I joined 

Tons of people seem to have flooded in just for this feature, so yes, they could be lost again.

The generative AI rules need to be modified to not be so restrictive with expanding upon photographs that have to do with the military.  I entered a prompt while working on an old photograph of my Grandfather taken in 1940 while he was training.  My prompt read, "a man in WWII field training attire" and it was flagged as violating the rules.

I've seen others try to make something historic like a musket without success, yet a bow and arrow is acceptable.  Each fires a projectile with the same goal.  Nonetheless, the context of the prompts has to somehow be taken into the equation.  Otherwise the service alienates many forms of art expression.

THAT was a silly thing I said, yes of course regular users such as myself will always stick with adobe. Just a pity it's become so expensive

so you'll have a job doing horror images ?  The whole AI scheme is very early yet, even those apps that change voices are rubbish. I've noticed a lot of you tubers are using the text to speech generated ones. All in all they're ok, BUT it's hilarious when the publisher doesn't check the finished result first.  Anyhoo back on topic. I was removing people from a photo in woodland I took a couple of weeks ago and even THAT violated user guidelines. They REALLY need to up their game or it's going to chase a lot of users away

Yep. That's the odd part. The source images are supposedly Adobe Stock and Adobe Stock only, which represents a relatively small sampling of images compared to dedicated AI text to image applications. Like maybe millions compared to billions? I dunno. While there are images of what I would call PG-rated nudes and those depicting relatively mild violence on Adobe Stock, it's difficult to understand why the bot is coming up with so many results deemed to be in violation of the guidelines. So the bot does seem to go rogue quite often at this point in time. Hence the reason for the beta. I think this is an issue that will be ironed out in the months ahead. This isn't going to be a short beta period. It's going to take some time.