Skip to main content
Participant
May 23, 2023

P: Generated images violate user guidelines

 

So as you can see, it's a PG-13 relatively inoffensive image of a woman in a bunny outfit. The top worked fine, and I was able to complete the top ear, which is cool. When I tried to extend the bottom with generative fill, though, I got this warning. They're just a pair of legs wearing stockings, and I wanted to extend it.

It feels like a false flag - though I could be wrong? I find myself thinking it would do the same for women in swimsuits.

Figured I'd share here.

1085 replies

Graham24508943nobd
Known Participant
June 3, 2023

Here's a new one. I had myself saved as the subject and typed colorful shirt. I was amazed to get THIS error. Sorry We don't recognise your language as English, please try again. I mean I even spelt Colorful the American way to help the Bot understand ROFLPSML

Known Participant
June 3, 2023

The AI is why I joined 

Zesty_wanderlust15A7
Known Participant
June 3, 2023

Tons of people seem to have flooded in just for this feature, so yes, they could be lost again.

slaughters85j
Participating Frequently
June 3, 2023

The generative AI rules need to be modified to not be so restrictive with expanding upon photographs that have to do with the military.  I entered a prompt while working on an old photograph of my Grandfather taken in 1940 while he was training.  My prompt read, "a man in WWII field training attire" and it was flagged as violating the rules.

 

I've seen others try to make something historic like a musket without success, yet a bow and arrow is acceptable.  Each fires a projectile with the same goal.  Nonetheless, the context of the prompts has to somehow be taken into the equation.  Otherwise the service alienates many forms of art expression.

Graham24508943nobd
Known Participant
June 3, 2023

THAT was a silly thing I said, yes of course regular users such as myself will always stick with adobe. Just a pity it's become so expensive

daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
June 3, 2023
Why would it chase users away? Adobe existed for years WITHOUT generated
fill. If they shut the feature off tomorrow, they wouldn't lose a single
customer. Users would just have to go back to working a little harder to
make their edits the old-fashioned way.
Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.
Graham24508943nobd
Known Participant
June 3, 2023

so you'll have a job doing horror images ?  The whole AI scheme is very early yet, even those apps that change voices are rubbish. I've noticed a lot of you tubers are using the text to speech generated ones. All in all they're ok, BUT it's hilarious when the publisher doesn't check the finished result first.  Anyhoo back on topic. I was removing people from a photo in woodland I took a couple of weeks ago and even THAT violated user guidelines. They REALLY need to up their game or it's going to chase a lot of users away

daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
June 3, 2023

Yep. That's the odd part. The source images are supposedly Adobe Stock and Adobe Stock only, which represents a relatively small sampling of images compared to dedicated AI text to image applications. Like maybe millions compared to billions? I dunno. While there are images of what I would call PG-rated nudes and those depicting relatively mild violence on Adobe Stock, it's difficult to understand why the bot is coming up with so many results deemed to be in violation of the guidelines. So the bot does seem to go rogue quite often at this point in time. Hence the reason for the beta. I think this is an issue that will be ironed out in the months ahead. This isn't going to be a short beta period. It's going to take some time. 

Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.
Graham24508943nobd
Known Participant
June 3, 2023

I typed smart suit in the prompt box and it came up with a superhero costume, in a female body at that😆😆. 

On facebook I jokingly told a female friend to shut up or I'd slap her I got banned for 14 days ROFL

Bernard Brand
Participant
June 3, 2023

@Kevin Stohlmeyerforgot to tag you in the above reply.