P: Generated images violate user guidelines

Dont think this is a inappropriate object

I suspect they do track every violation, but not tally them to say 20 strikes and you're out. There is a difference between the AI getting it wrong and someone trying to abuse it. 

I'd like to think I can have 1000 flags on innocent images or even non-pornographic NSFW images and they will review them and go "The AI failed here", but I'd like to think if it was a clear misuse, especially such as where a minor was involved and someone was trying to turn that image NSFW, then Adobe would and should report that if their prompt was intentionally trying to create harmful content. If it was an innocent prompt that lead to a NSFW image, then that is where Adobe would be at fault and that is what they want to avoid. 

Photoshop as it stands now can be used maliciously; it is not hard to take a NSFW image and put it on a celebrities head with simple blending skills and call it a deep fake, but AI can make this task a lot easier for the layman without retouching skills. That is what Adobe is trying to protect from. 

Lorsque je demande remplissage génératif on me dit qu'il a effacer les suggestions car j'ai enfreint la loi sur l'utilisation. Pourtant je n'ai rien fait que de demander Générer.

Please don´t get me wrong. I do not blame anyone. I would like to get some answers.
Maybe it´s a freaking bot, but Adobe built it and set the rules. (As Midjourney does.)
I think there is a new universe of possibilities and we the people (and the developers?) haven't thought about the implications yet.
So it's safer for AI companies to block certain things at the moment.

The guidelines don't actually say "No NSFW" they say not to use it to create pornographic or harmful content. 

We can blame Adobe for the improper wording. The message should them say that the image that the Adobe AI created does not meet Adobe Guidelines, but as currently worded it means that your image does not meet Adobe Guidelines. They have to fix this to avoid consumer rejection of the program. Right now only an Adobe Rep can assure me that they are not tallying the people with the guideline messages. Most likely not, because of it being a beta program, but proper assurance from Adobe staff would make me feel more comfortable to use it.

About the not being tallied by Adobe, I would like to hear that from an Adobe Rep or Adobe's legal department. Too bad that a company that makes billions a year is not able to have proper support staff and only relies on a comunity to answer questions. Not saying that you are wrong and at least thanks for responding, but Adobe has to have personnel that can answer these questions and be liable for the answer. If you are mistaken, Adobe will claim that the answer was from a community member and not an Adobe associate. Just a simple way to avoid legal liability

Let's not blame Adobe just yet. Remember...when technology like this comes around, pornographers are the first to jump in and use it to their advantage. That said, it has nothing to do with censorship. It's a freaking bot, not a human, making these judgement calls based on what the bot creates, not what we specifically ask for. And if you think this is bad, do a Google search for words banned on Midjourney. Like pixie, for example. Or transparent. Everybody calm down. 🙂

I feel extremely uncomfortable when my tools tell me what I'm allowed to do with them!

What would our culture be like if...

Michelangelo's chisels hadn't worked because their manufacturers didn't like depictions of naked men?

Sandro Botticelli's brushes had failed because they were not allowed to paint a Venus?

The tool I use judges what I am allowed to do? Really?

Is that censorship?
Any response from ADOBE? 

I'm curious what happens when the bug is removed.
In many parts of the world, NSFW regulations are not nearly as restrictive as in the US. Topl-e-s-s women are even shown on public TV. (oh, naked men too ;-)) (In my case Europe / Germany, and don't ask what's going on in France or Italy). For sure countries with large amount of Adobe customers. And then there is artistic freedom. Not all artists create images for Kindergartens.  It is probably the responsibility of the artist what he thinks he can/may publish where.
It's really very annoying that US companies tell artists all over the world what they can and can't do.
This isn't limited to Adobe.

PS: Btw, the word t-o-p-less is not allowed in this forum! ... really?, c'mon.