Participant

P: Generated images violate user guidelines

Forum|Forum|2 years ago
May 23, 2023
1087 replies
307875 views

So as you can see, it's a PG-13 relatively inoffensive image of a woman in a bunny outfit. The top worked fine, and I was able to complete the top ear, which is cool. When I tried to extend the bottom with generative fill, though, I got this warning. They're just a pair of legs wearing stockings, and I wanted to extend it.

It feels like a false flag - though I could be wrong? I find myself thinking it would do the same for women in swimsuits.

Figured I'd share here.

This topic has been closed for replies.

Show previous replies

Rafaelis

Inspiring

Like someone wrote elsewhere in this topic, typing a period in the What would you like to generate? (Optional) field will get you around most of these guideline errors. At least when it comes to editing something out of an image.

J

jjgallegos

Known Participant

Hi Chaztize,

Sometimes a period (.) helps when making small fills.

C

chaztize

Participant

I have tried to use Generative Fill to clean creases in the skin like smile and brow lines. It worked once very well, but most of the time I get a note that "The generated images were removed because they violate user guidelines." I think this needs to be addressed because it could be very useful.

Justin Other

Inspiring

This error drives me insane. I've given up trying to work on any image that has a human in it. It takes many times longer to use Photoshop AI to clean up portraits or to extend hair and such than it does to do it with my long-established workflows. I think how the team deals with this error is what will make or break the tool for Adobe. At present, it's a great idea on paper, but it's frustrating to see that message about guildines all the time —esoecially when there is no basis for it. I get it, sure, the AI doesn't have perfect knowledge of exactly what is in the image nor the intent and purpose of the image. Nonetheless, it's a fair guess that not all images that include a human are for prurient purposes. Here's hoping that the AI gets better trained, sooner.

K

kenwood333

Known Participant

Hi @Caity.psd , updated to the latest and the violation error is gone. Thank you.

K

kenwood333

Known Participant

Glad to see there is a workaround. I hope they don't take this away.

JR Boulay

Community Expert

Hi Caity.psd

Nothing has changed, it's exactly the same behaviour.

Acrobate du PDF, InDesigner et Photoshopographe

J

jjgallegos

Known Participant

I see some people have successfully updated to v.25.1. Unfortunately, mine still crashes after I launch it. Version 25 is working well, except for the expand function which is not seamless. I understand it's fixed for v.25.1. Am I the only one whose v.25.1 crashes, or are there still other folks out there who are still having this problem?

Old Dell

32GB

Windows 10-64bit

Nvidia GT 1030

Caity.psd

Community Manager

Hi @kenwood333 could you also update to 25.1 and test again? Judging by your screenshot I see the outdated error toast message and want to see if you face the issue still in 25.1