P: Generated images violate user guidelines

Enter a period (.) in the generative fill box. Or, better yet, just use content aware fill.

[virewer discretion advised] I was not getting results with any word or phrase I typed into the generative fill, simple phrases like "internal conflict" or "military care" to spark some kind of stock image kept giving me the tired "violating guidelines" error -- once even a "we don't tolerate that language" kind of error. Just simple english, nothing vulgar.

On the other hand, just typing the word "anything" into the generative fill gave me some of the most disturbing nightmare fuel I've ever seen. What in the world is going on with this software?! These are the types of images PS beta should be focused on removing, good greif! More than a few bugs to work out I'm sure ☹

Hey guy, I feel your pain, but when I first posted having a similar problem some time back, people advised me to put a simple period "." in the dialog box. I don't have any issues now that I am putting either ONLY that period in the box or eles adding a period before or after the text I put in that box. Can you try that and let us know if it works?

Adding another frustrated, working creative professional voice here - I'm unable to use generative fill for something as simple as improving the texture of a dress shirt when before I was able to create pretty much anything my imagination could come up with. The subject matter on my particular image is a boring asf male laywer headshot. Do you want us to use these tools or not? I get that we're in "beta" still so I'm not that surprised and I'm happy to help Adobe improve their tools but please make this tool more reliable over time not less... 

I've now been having this issue on a senior photos. So obviously a very appropriate photo. I'm very frustrated because it worked once and now it's flagging everything. 

demon horde group

cloaked horde group

with and without period. BOTH "Violate Terms"

Any prompt I try to use with the word Blood in it "Violate Terms"

WHY????????????????????

Utterly ridiculous. 

On occasion, when a word is banned, I look it up on urbandictionary.com. There are often less than appropriate definitions for otherwise common words. This is an issue that will probably be fixed in time, especially once the bot learns to tale into account the context of the request.

Firefly doesn't like "nook", as in "a corner nook".  There's little rationality to it.  I wonder what it does about "beaver" and "butt", two words with straightforward meanings (an animal and the target end of an archery field)?

Strange, it works 100% of the time for me when I get a warning.

Absolutely unusable. Given up