Skip to main content
Participant
May 23, 2023

P: Generated images violate user guidelines

 

So as you can see, it's a PG-13 relatively inoffensive image of a woman in a bunny outfit. The top worked fine, and I was able to complete the top ear, which is cool. When I tried to extend the bottom with generative fill, though, I got this warning. They're just a pair of legs wearing stockings, and I wanted to extend it.

It feels like a false flag - though I could be wrong? I find myself thinking it would do the same for women in swimsuits.

Figured I'd share here.

1084 replies

Kevin Stohlmeyer
Community Expert
Community Expert
October 6, 2023

@CSI Productions I didnt do the entire curtain - just the specific area that @Jann Lipka had selected before. Those are just two examples the second does show a smooth curtain without a wrinkle in that specific area.

Jann Lipka
Inspiring
October 6, 2023

OK so not following tooltip seems to work best . 
( "remove wrinkles " prompt works - No prompt give me violation 
Screenshot 5 minutes ago ( I thought maybe AI learned from my tries ( 10 times " providing feedback" )
- I lost probably 50 credits on this .-) 
I have most recent Beta ( OSX )

daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
October 6, 2023

Maybe I'm having better luck with generative fill more than others because I've only used it once to add something. Otherwise, I use it to remove things (with the exception of Generative Expand, and only then when I want to change the aspect ratio to expand an empty background). The only time I've used GF. to add something was to add a highway next to a hitchhiker and it required a good 20+ attempts to get something acceptable. 

Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.
CSI Productions
Inspiring
October 6, 2023

Just an observation - Unless I'm missing something, the two images of the wrinkled curtain which you say worked doesn't look any different than the original (at least not noticibly). What am I missing?

R.CatesCSI ProductionsIf you want peace, be peaceful.
Kevin Stohlmeyer
Community Expert
Community Expert
October 6, 2023

@Jann Lipka When you have specific needs, adding a prompt is best. Otherwise I compare it to throwing dirt in a windstorm with the expectation that it lands all back in your hand. Users need to be detailed and descriptive with prompts when you have specific needs or leave it all to chance.

 

With Generative Fill 1.0 leaving it blank can cause false violations - as stated throughout this thread.

daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
October 6, 2023

I had no problem with it, either, using a period as a prompt.

Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.
Jann Lipka
Inspiring
October 6, 2023

OK noted and indeed it worked OTOH 
"tooltip " dialog specifically mentions NOT to 
fill any prompt when removing things just making loose selection . So thats what I did 

Kevin Stohlmeyer
Community Expert
Community Expert
October 6, 2023

@Jann Lipka So this is not a case of "AI Paranoia" - as noted extensively in here, leaving the prompt blank can lead to false flag errors. Selecting the same area you noted and adding a prompt "Smooth fabric" worked just fine with your original image. No need to invert a reddish image.

 

Jann Lipka
Inspiring
October 6, 2023

Zero prompt - i just wanted to remove creases in the fabrics 
You can download my file - and check - 
when red - No go - violation 
Inverted to cyan  - it works . 





Kevin Stohlmeyer
Community Expert
Community Expert
October 6, 2023

@Jann Lipka what prompt were you using and what was the expected outcome? There is no "bias" for red tone images at all.