P: Generated images violate user guidelines

Hi there!

I am trying to edit a photo in the photoshop beta, and all I am trying to do is replace a floor where a mother and daughter are standing. However, I keep getting a notification saying that "The generative fill has been removed due to guideline violations" which is totally not true! 

I'm thinking this is a bug. 

Has anyone else found that trying to generate any part of the human body since the last update has been almost impossible ?

I've been trying to get a horribly deformed mouth to suit a pretty face but it's taaken me 20 attempts. Here's three of the horrors I've had to endure so far. As for limbs ?  Sheeeesh what a joke. One woman had four arms, with the green head she looked so much like Medusa I had to get her off my screen in case she turned me to stone .  My opinion is that generations have become much much worse 

I had one earlier where i had a woman on the beach. I'd generated her head about 15 times as her faces were so hideous. Three of them violated user guidelines. My last one generated a mans head with long hair, and THAT too violated user guidelines 😅😅😅.  It certainly violated my brain before dinner LOL

Community Guidelines restrictiveness renders RF (late July 25.0.0 beta) almost to the point of being useless except for the most mundane and safe tasks. I don't get it. Community guidelines should be enforced on saving files in Adobe public accessible and viewable areas, not while creating - editing. I would think that cloud server usage would be more important, as multiple failed attempts by virtually everyone that uses it have to be an issue. These falures MUST be wasting a lot of server resources. The AI is rather amazing in its technical abilities, but is absolutely awful at discering true X rated imagery. Who cares what the rating is if other measures are in place as I alluded to at the beginning. Pretty damn ironic that most of the violations I get are fills that the AI created. RF has been out long enough to address this despite it being a so called beta. This minimum age thing to use RF is also just madness .. though I'm well over 18. Adobe programmticlly impresses me somewhat sometimes, but often has me looking for alternatives ..

Add a period (.) or full stop (.) to your request

Adding a prompt worked for me when I tried it for the second time. I just updated to version 24.7.0. Hope you all can figure out this bug. Thanks for the beta, I absolutely LOVE it! It's a game-changer. 🙂

I would agree. I got a warning over a common word (don't remember what it was, now) that wasn't being used for anything remotely related to sex. But it was a word that COULD be used for that purpose. I would've thought AI could detect the context of the photo. I did report it. 

I honestly can't see it happening anytime soon. I'm not a kick on the backside off 70, so I reckon I'll be pushin up the daisies before it get's released. FAR too many bugs yet.