Skip to main content
Participant
May 23, 2023

P: Generated images violate user guidelines

 

So as you can see, it's a PG-13 relatively inoffensive image of a woman in a bunny outfit. The top worked fine, and I was able to complete the top ear, which is cool. When I tried to extend the bottom with generative fill, though, I got this warning. They're just a pair of legs wearing stockings, and I wanted to extend it.

It feels like a false flag - though I could be wrong? I find myself thinking it would do the same for women in swimsuits.

Figured I'd share here.

This topic has been closed for replies.

1087 replies

Graham24508943nobd
Known Participant
July 19, 2023

oh that must have been brilliant.😅😅😅

JR Boulay
Community Expert
Community Expert
July 19, 2023

This isn't just about AI. There has clearly been a POLICY DECISION that Photoshop should start controlling its users.

gadget13769, it reminds me of when Adobe decided to ban Photoshop from scanning or displaying banknotes (around 2005). I've done training courses in banks where the graphic designers went berserk.

😉

Acrobate du PDF, InDesigner et Photoshopographe
Graham24508943nobd
Known Participant
July 19, 2023

Seemingly Cornice is violating user guidelines. Now in the UK WE call it a pelmet. It doesn't work typing Decorative Cornice, it doesn't understand pelmet either. Cornice furnishing aslo violates whilst pelmet furnishing is ok. Odd thing is it allows a lit cigarette in an ashtray.

I was working on a Victorian lady sitting a table and a pelmet was a standard piece of decoration.

Graham24508943nobd
Known Participant
July 19, 2023

Fabrege is another word it won't accept. Fabrege meaning one of the priceless Russian jewel eggs.

daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
July 19, 2023

Since Adobe has already started pushing ads about the new generative fill feature in Photoshop, I suspect that the programmers are working as hard and as diligently as they can to get things working properly. But this incredible feature (at least when it's working, which I suspect is most of the time) is and will probably remain in beta for quite some time to come.

Adobe Community Expert | If you aren't submitting your assets in sRGB, you probably didn't read the rules.
Graham24508943nobd
Known Participant
July 18, 2023

I've noticed this often helps as well. Never thought of mentioning this

Participant
July 18, 2023

When I run into guideline issues, it often helps me to flatten the layers and then try again.

daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
July 18, 2023

I got it to work using my method of making a small additional selection on the dark background curtain.

Adobe Community Expert | If you aren't submitting your assets in sRGB, you probably didn't read the rules.
Inspiring
July 18, 2023

Have any of the complainers uploaded their files as requested by Adobe? That is the only way the problem will be resolved.

Kevin Stohlmeyer
Community Expert
Community Expert
July 18, 2023

@PeterGJones what did you enter for a prompt? I used your image and put a period "." in the Gen Fill prompt and it cleaned up everything including your arrow.

 

Participating Frequently
July 18, 2023

CAn one of you Adobe employees explain WHY you are censoring everything we try to do? I can understand blocking unlawful acts as per the territory in which your software is used, but when you are telling us what we can and cannot have in a professional photoshoot..you must have a good reason- We'd love to know what it is?????