Skip to main content
Participant
May 23, 2023 8:09 PM UTC
Released

P: Generated images violate user guidelines

 

So as you can see, it's a PG-13 relatively inoffensive image of a woman in a bunny outfit. The top worked fine, and I was able to complete the top ear, which is cool. When I tried to extend the bottom with generative fill, though, I got this warning. They're just a pair of legs wearing stockings, and I wanted to extend it.

It feels like a false flag - though I could be wrong? I find myself thinking it would do the same for women in swimsuits.

Figured I'd share here.

This topic is closed to new replies. Start a new post to keep the conversation going.

1392 replies

Participating Frequently
Jul 15, 2023 3:54 PM UTC

Also a frustrating violation whilst trying to create a very PG13 image- I wanted to put a whelk on a rock on a beach. I  got the rock and the beach, but I can only assume that a whelk has another meaning these days, 'cos it triggers a violation every time. I tried a winkle instead. Same violation error. "Shellfish" gives entirely the wrong type of shell, so I cant work round it. This sort of obsessive word list banning, without context, is very very frustrating and counter-productive.

Translate
Rejean Brandt
Participant
Jul 15, 2023 3:51 PM UTC

Using Generative Fill will often result in a pop-up message saying "The generated images were removed because they violate user guidelines" when no guidelines were violated. This happens more often when using Generative Fill without a prompt but sometimes with a prompt too. 

Translate
Graham24508943nobd
Known Participant
Jul 15, 2023 2:24 PM UTC

it's sad how many half naked women show up in generations. In fact once I had a pic of a woman wearing nothing from the waist down. Clear violation of their own guidlines I'd say

Translate
DarthVengeant
Inspiring
Jul 15, 2023 2:19 PM UTC

One issue is that if there is even a hint of nudity in the image, it "violates terms". So, if I am expanding the background of an image, why does it matter if the person/subject in the image is half or fully nude? I am expanding the background, not the person. The person is utterly irrelvant to expanding the background. What is it Adobe's business? This is the kind of big brother nonsense we dont need as artists.

Translate
mixchal301227617w1b
Participant
Jul 15, 2023 2:14 PM UTC

yeah, those limitations are killing AI features. 

Translate
Participant
Jul 15, 2023 2:06 PM UTC

These guidlines are rediculous.  I work with fashion/boudoir, no nudity and generative fill could be SO helpful and  useful, but if a belly is showing I violate guidlines.  Please lighten up on this Adobe, let all of us creators/photogs get some use out of this feature.

Translate
Participant
Jul 14, 2023 2:18 PM UTC

I want to edit a sleeve of a man's shirt, since the edge of one of the sleeves of the arm is pixelated, however the generative filler tells me that it is violating the user guidelines, the same thing has happened to me removing imperfections of the face, like pimples, even, I wanted to remove a chair from the background and it told me that it violated the user guidelines.

Translate
Graham24508943nobd
Known Participant
Jul 14, 2023 1:32 PM UTC

cowgirl country singer.   was the prompt I used. I thought it's quite an easy straight forward one ?

Translate
Graham24508943nobd
Known Participant
Jul 14, 2023 1:31 PM UTC

try the period or full stop at the end of your prompt.

Translate
Graham24508943nobd
Known Participant
Jul 14, 2023 12:05 PM UTC

Yesterday on adobe firefly.com I prompted for a cowgirl country singer. out of 16 generations more than half were men. NOT a good reslt by any means. I DO find the qulity online slightly better for humans although too many have that artificial plastic look to them.

Translate
Immaculens
Inspiring
Jul 14, 2023 2:53 AM UTC


How does this violate a user guideline? I made a selection around a present to remove...

Translate
Kevin Stohlmeyer
Community Expert
Community Expert
Jul 14, 2023 1:22 PM UTC

What prompt did you enter?

Translate