Skip to main content
Participant
May 23, 2023 8:09 PM UTC
Released

P: Generated images violate user guidelines

 

So as you can see, it's a PG-13 relatively inoffensive image of a woman in a bunny outfit. The top worked fine, and I was able to complete the top ear, which is cool. When I tried to extend the bottom with generative fill, though, I got this warning. They're just a pair of legs wearing stockings, and I wanted to extend it.

It feels like a false flag - though I could be wrong? I find myself thinking it would do the same for women in swimsuits.

Figured I'd share here.

This topic is closed to new replies. Start a new post to keep the conversation going.

1392 replies

Graham24508943nobd
Known Participant
Jul 11, 2023 2:49 PM UTC

Latest disallowed nonsense is sporran. Admin, please pass on and correct. Sporran IS correct spelling and a main accessory to a Scottish outfit.

Translate
jane-e
Community Expert
Community Expert
Jul 11, 2023 1:30 PM UTC

@zvi_t 

 

I'm glad "spatial" worked for you! I've been noticing the misspellings that cause errors and have on-purpose misspelled words. Several folks have wondered why on earth "elefant" would cause an error, for instance, and I agree that spell check would be a good addition. Also, there are many folks who are writing in English when it's not their native language. That has to be tough.

 

Adobe has been moving all of these posts into one thread so they can be reviewed while GF is still in beta.

 

In addition, see Pete's pinned reply for sending files with false flags to the Photoshop team.

 

Jane

Translate
Participant
Jul 11, 2023 1:04 PM UTC

Hello,

 

I regularly get the "generated images were removed, because they violate community guidelines"... when I am filling in blanks or removing small blemishes with blank prompts.

 

Should I be worried? Because I would not like my account to be deleted for trying to remove a white stain from red background…

 

Greetings!

Translate
jane-e
Community Expert
Community Expert
Jul 11, 2023 12:01 PM UTC

 

@zvi_t wrote: Violation for "large" and "spacial"?

 

Can you tell us what happens when you try using "spatial", the preferred spelling of the word?

 

Jane

 

Translate
higurashiwillow
Participant
Jul 11, 2023 7:07 AM UTC

I meant to reply to the person posting about removing reflection with a fully clothed person 

Translate
higurashiwillow
Participant
Jul 11, 2023 7:06 AM UTC

This is mostly the kind of thing I've been trying to use generative fill for (to varying degrees of success). I can see how some of the things people are posting are triggering flags even if they're unwarranted, but it also seems to be a pretty common issue with bokeh, small blemishes, streaks, shadows etc. When it works it does a much more efficient and better job at cleaning up an image then other healing tools (and don't even get me started on the remove tool which is straight up unusable) except it's extremely unreliable and when I do get it to work it's usually taken a lot of fiddling and failed attempts prior. Hopefully this gets solved because I think the potential is definitely there. 

Translate
Graham24508943nobd
Known Participant
Jul 10, 2023 9:35 PM UTC

Never thought of leeks 🤣

Translate
J E L
Community Expert
Community Expert
Jul 10, 2023 8:22 PM UTC

LOL @Graham24508943nobd. I had to try it.

Translate
Graham24508943nobd
Known Participant
Jul 10, 2023 5:38 PM UTC

No problem on my side.

 

 

Translate
Graham24508943nobd
Known Participant
Jul 10, 2023 3:31 PM UTC

Latest word that violated user guidelines is.........

Wait for it.......

 

 

LEEK

 

In the name of the wee man, how incredibly stupid is THAT ?  Even a full stop ( period ) after the word didn't work this time. Also Strip Light brought the violation notice. yesterday too

Translate