P: Generated images violate user guidelines

@zvi_t wrote: Violation for "large" and "spacial"?

Can you tell us what happens when you try using "spatial", the preferred spelling of the word?

Jane

I meant to reply to the person posting about removing reflection with a fully clothed person 

This is mostly the kind of thing I've been trying to use generative fill for (to varying degrees of success). I can see how some of the things people are posting are triggering flags even if they're unwarranted, but it also seems to be a pretty common issue with bokeh, small blemishes, streaks, shadows etc. When it works it does a much more efficient and better job at cleaning up an image then other healing tools (and don't even get me started on the remove tool which is straight up unusable) except it's extremely unreliable and when I do get it to work it's usually taken a lot of fiddling and failed attempts prior. Hopefully this gets solved because I think the potential is definitely there. 

Never thought of leeks 🤣

LOL @Graham24508943nobd. I had to try it.

No problem on my side.

Latest word that violated user guidelines is.........

Wait for it.......

LEEK

In the name of the wee man, how incredibly stupid is THAT ?  Even a full stop ( period ) after the word didn't work this time. Also Strip Light brought the violation notice. yesterday too

every time I try to use the generative tool I get a message saying that the images generated were deleted because they violate user guidelines. I was initially tying to delete a shadow but I've tried different commands and I get the same message over & over again. 

Had the problem with messy colours bleeding a lot

The second cow image is probably closer than the first, but it looks like longer sentences get better results