Skip to main content
Participant
May 23, 2023

P: Generated images violate user guidelines

 

So as you can see, it's a PG-13 relatively inoffensive image of a woman in a bunny outfit. The top worked fine, and I was able to complete the top ear, which is cool. When I tried to extend the bottom with generative fill, though, I got this warning. They're just a pair of legs wearing stockings, and I wanted to extend it.

It feels like a false flag - though I could be wrong? I find myself thinking it would do the same for women in swimsuits.

Figured I'd share here.

1084 replies

Participating Frequently
September 25, 2023

"legitmate"?   Really?  What is legitmate AI?  There are some very "legitimate" AI engines that allow for creativity without word censorship.  These I will be using rather than Adobe's poor attempt at a narrow market. 

daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
September 25, 2023

Every legitimate AI platform has a banned word list. And always will.

Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.
Participating Frequently
September 25, 2023

No word should be "in question"

daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
September 25, 2023

As I've mentioned elsewhere, I put clothing (usually swimwear tops and bottoms) on entirely nude models to make them suitable for Facebook (talk about censorship!) and have never had problems. At least none that I couldn't find work-arounds for. If skin or nudity is the cause of any issues, it still to me is the result of a bug.

Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.
Participating Frequently
September 25, 2023

Okay putting periods in sometimes helps BUT the nudity does matter.  Adobe, please address this issue of censorship.  Please continue your long standing support of open creativity.  We are artists, photographers and creaters.  Please respect that.

daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
September 24, 2023

Yeah, I figured that out after I posted. 🙂 I'm not a programmer by any means, but even if it were possible, it would just be a band-aid and not a solution.

Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.
Inspiring
September 24, 2023

@daniellei4510

To be clear I didn't mean the period should be automatically put into the visable prompt field but put into the code to fix the error message. The user wouldn't see it. 

daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
September 24, 2023

I wondered that myself in the very beginning. Possibly because if a period were entered automatically, then users who normaly enter an actual prompt would have to remove it each time or enter their cursor in front of it. But just a guess. Meanwhile, keep in mind that a released version doesn't necessary mean that all bugs have been eliminated, but only that it is stable enough to be released into the wild. I'm sure your cell phone and numerous applications on your phone or computer require updating on a frequent bases to eliminate bugs or privacy issues discovered after the public release, sometimes even months later.

Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.
Inspiring
September 24, 2023

Yes, entering a "." period does fix the guideline error most of the time. What I do not understand is why isn't the period correction just put into the generative code by the engineers who are developing this AI program? Why is it left for us to continue to try to correct this bug? If the period works, why isn't it automatic and behind the scenes?

daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
September 24, 2023

Have you attempted to enter a period (.) as your prompt? This fixes the issue 99% of the time. It's been well documented here. Nudity has nothing to do with it.

Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.