Just prompted for a forest again and ONE solitary tree appeared. It's a joke.  In saying that, here's an image I made recently

Talking about bad results, how many times have users prompted things like forest, table, person animal etc.... and NOTHING shows up ?  Same with asking for a waterfall lately

But it also provides a LOT of bad results (deformed hands and feet, grotesque faces, 3 legs, etc) without triggering the violation caption.

I've had this gibberish frequently, so annoying 

@twistless wrote: Becasue they violate user guidelines

GF is in beta. Did you send the psd, saved selection, and prompt to Adobe as per the pinned reply from Pete Green?

Jane

Did the beta update. "Becasue they violate user guidelines" is still absolutely brutal. No change in it creeping into 95% or what I try to do. Was hoping tht the update would fix this. Even with prompts, even with elements that are rated PG (or even rated G for that matter), even when the subjects aren't even people at all, just assume your attempt is going to get struck down. As many have said... these restrictions are making everything completely frustrating. Photoshop has never policed my images in my past 25 years of using it. If this is the path that companies are going to take, other companies will find a way and the masses will leave the restrictive ones behind. Just a matter of time.

user guidelines are very aggressive, repeatedly detects inappropriate material that does not violate the rules
I am working with an image of a girl and a man dressed as a car mechanic, he is pointing the way to the girl, I want to enlarge the photo panorama, but Photoshop takes it as inappropriate, in another occasion, it was a man helping a woman to stand up in a park because she had fallen, I wanted to enlarge the background, but Photoshop takes it as inappropriate.

I generated an image in midjourney which added gibberish to a shirt. When I tried to remove the gibberish in photoshop, I was denied the action and told it violated user guidelines.