P: Generated images violate user guidelines

I continue to get guideline issues with 80% of images containing people. When trying ot extend an image with a person in it, (fully clothed, not a bikini). And in this instance, trying to repair an ear from a midjourney creation. Is there anyway around this?

When starting from a blank canvas and creating a square using the Rectangular Marque tool, I'm receiving violation notifications when using the word "cube" in tandem with Generative AI.

@zevendesign18164115  This has also been my thoughts while playing with it the past week; if I'm running into this so often when I am trying it on some really boring diner photos, what is this going to be like when I try it on a portrait session?  Will we not even be able to use it at all on boudoir-or-more photos, even if you're trying to do something innocuous like "remove wrinkles on backdrop" or "add chandelier" to an image - pretty basic tasks that can and are routinely done without AI, but AI will help with retouching by saving time and providing a great base to work with; just like someone else mentioned about wedding photos, blinks and smiles are a super frequent retouching task.  Like, if walls and wheelchairs are too much, it seems overly restrictive, and naiive, to think that other projects, which are very common by the way, should be restricted or impacted.  I haven't put any actual portraits in to see what it will or won't do yet, but your concerns have been on my mind all week since I started running into "violations" just dealing with boring walls.

I also started getting a bunch of the "violation warnings" last night while editing pictures of a restaurant interior.

In some cases I simply asked Generative AI to "Expand wall background." and got flagged... it's 60s themed diner; pretty tame stuff.

On other pictures, I have asked it to remove people, but the flag seems to stem from terminology problems.  If I say "Remove kid" or "Remove child and replace with wall." it will always flag as against guidelines, same result frequently if you say "Erase man" or "Remove woman."  The only surefire way to not get flagged is to say "Remove person."

I even got flagged trying to "remove wheelchair," but later got success with changing the terminology to "remove wheelchair and replace with nearby walls and floor."  I had to say "floor" instead of "flooring" to not get flagged.  For further experimentation, I tried "motion blur kid's face" and got flagged, but then tried "motion blur person's face" and it generated three low-res completely different heads that were totally of different races and in one case race and gender than the original; useful for other purposes, but also still not what I asked.

When it does work, it works great most of the time even with surprisingly complicated scenes, but still some issues to tidy up before dropping the beta label.  I'm very impressed with it thus far, and it does work most of the time, I'm just concerned why I'm getting flagged for "violating user guidelines" on images without people and asking for walls, floors, counters, or chairs already existing in the frame to be generated, expanded, or duplicated; that needs to get fixed.

I just sent a photo I was working on at work. (DS_Award_for_Adobe.psd)

Not sure how you line up what I uploaded with my account here.

But... I saved 2 selections for you and can guide you on a third as it uses the crop to increase the size of the image and I didn't want to foul up the initial generative fill rejection by sending it in with the larger area. The only thing I can figure... and it's grasping at straws here, is there's a lot of pink in the photo, and perhaps photoshop thinks it's... em... pink parts? When you look at the image, it's several people on a stage getting an award. Nothing remotely naughty in the picture. Initially, I was trying to remove the text on the background to the right and the sleeve of someone just entering the frame. 

The recipe for the other direction that didn't work with this image is using the crop tool to extend the image downwards. This is for a video I am working on (1920x1080) and I scaled the image to 1500 pix high before proceeding. I used the crop and pulled it down to 1698 px. I made a selection including a small slice of the bottom of the image and hit generate, leaving the prompt box empty.

Gostaria de saber como é possivel que o prompt de recheio generativo "parede branca" e "fundo branco" pode estar mal?????

Maybe I am wrong, but it seems that perhaps the violations are more common with skin tones? I've not done any definitive testing, but in general it seems to me that:

- Working with colors like blue and green I am not getting any violations.

- Working with colors along the skin tone color range tend to give community violations even when working on non human objects like a wall or a sheet, especially when prompt is empty. 

No idea why it was removed it was a picture of someone wearing belly dancing clothes. No not offencive in any way. Unless the Moderator is some super religious OTT  prude  and doesn't like the sight of a belly button