P: Generated images violate user guidelines

I said it befor, I'll say it again. It's not the user violating the guidelines...it's the bot refusing to accept its own results. If the error message were to read something along the lines of, "the bot has generated results that are in violation of user guidelines and cannot be displayed," I think we'd have fewer instances of complaints over here. While I've received numerous violation notices, generative fill to date has saved a least a dozen of my images that would have taken hours to fix, if I bothered to fix them at all. Be patient, people. 

"The reason why these tools tend to fail on hands and feet is because these AI companies tend to steer clear of human anatomy (inherently 'evil'). Meanwhile if you learn real art this is the foundation where you start. "

You wouldn't know it from the number of images of amply chested women I see often on AI platforms. No, the real reason is that AI has difficulties with hands and feet for the same reason that real artists often find them difficult to draw or paint. They are very complex parts of our anatomy. At this time, Midjourney usually (I emphasise usually) does a very good job with hands and fingers. With feet, not so much. 

Hi @VeneficusFerox as mentioned in here extensively, try entering a prompt to bypass the false error.

@E250916993jnw, ha, re your point: “Meanwhile if you learn real art this is the foundation where you start,” I'm reminded of Szukalski, who complained when ordered in art school to learn from live figures, saying, “Working from the model destroys the talent.”

Before everyone goes off on some tangental rant about dystopian censorship [too late!] - ever thought that this is simply a bug in a beta release? Try entering a prompt, even a simple one and the error response goes away...

It's pretty much useless for beach photography, sports photography. Whether a man or a woman it'll say it's violating community guidelines. Was this tool designed by a radical cleric? Lol.

The reason why these tools tend to fail on hands and feet is because these AI companies tend to steer clear of human anatomy (inherently 'evil'). Meanwhile if you learn real art this is the foundation where you start. 

While most censorship and content restrictions are valid, placing too many restrictions like those on visuals such as blood is unnecessary and hamper creativity. I wanted to turn a portrait of a model into a vampire and wanted some blood dripping from her mouth. But even a little trickle of blood violates the guidelines which seem intentionally set up to be broken even by those with purely creative intentions. 

Hi, I've had two instances of the generative fill refusing to continue due to 'not complying with community guidelines'. The first was when I tried to remove a tattoo on a man's chest, and the 2nd was when I tried to extend a tulle skirt to allow an image to sit in a higher position on the page (no skin visible at all). Seems very weird that generative fill is 'policing' content that I produce in the privacy of my own computer. Even if I did want to produce an explicit image (which I don't) what's the problem?

Ditto - editing flowers and using Generative AI results in "violations".

The false flagging is so ridiculous I also took and uploaded video.