Skip to main content
vladan_1911
Participant
February 25, 2026

P: PS 27.4 Image > Trap for CMYK images isn't consistent when used in Modern UI

  • February 25, 2026
  • 4 replies
  • 133 views

Traping appers much larger than the set values (pixels, milimetars, points).

Example if you set 0.01mm in reality trapping is much bigger (0.05 or 0.1mm) and there is a visual diffrence between when you set your units to milimetars or pixels. Earlyer versions did not have that problem.

    4 replies

    davescm
    Community Expert
    Community Expert
    April 7, 2026

    As a workaround, you can go to Preferences > Technology Previews and uncheck ‘ Enable Modern User Interface’, then restart Photoshop This restores the correct behaviour, and although it is not a fix it should allow you to work with trap settings as expected.

    Dave

    Inspiring
    April 8, 2026

    can confirm this fix worked for me 

    davescm
    Community Expert
    Community Expert
    April 7, 2026

     

    I can replicate this in v27.5.0  on Windows 11.

    Correct widths are :

    .08mm = .00315 inches = 0.227 points = 0.945 pixels (@300ppi)). 

    v27.5 incorrectly sets the trap approx 10 x wider than set in the dialogue - unless the trap width is set in pixels.

    Dave
     

    Inspiring
    April 6, 2026

    Mac OS 15.7.4

    Mac Silicon M1

     

    Issue first appeared in v. 27.4; still exists in updated 27.5.

    Did not exist prior to 27.4; does not exist in version 26.4.1 (concurrently installed).

     

    When using “Trap” command from Image menu and entering a trap width, trapping applied is extremely larger, by a factor of 10x or more (depending on resolution of art). This only occurs when the trap width is entered as a physical measurement (mm, points). It does not occur when entering a fixed pixel width.

     

    Steps to repeat:

    Create an image @ 300 ppi or higher, with two or more color channels. (Spot color or process.)

    Create any shape (circle, etc.)

    Fill one channel in that shape, Knock out the other, so the two channels meet at a hard edge.

    Select both color channels.

    Invoke the Trap command (Image menu).

    Set the Trap width to a number of pixels (1-2 or so).

    Note the width of the trap. (for illustrative purposes only)

    Undo Trap.

    Invoke the Trap command again, but this time set the width to 0.08 mm. (Standard offset press trapping.)
    NOTE the width of the trap.

    Undo again, and do the Trap again with a measurement of 0.23 points. (Equivalent of 0.08 mm.)

     

    0.08 mm =0.00315 in or 0.22677 points

    at 300 ppi around 0.945 pixels; or 1.417 pixels at 450 ppi.

     

    Fractional widths can be entered for physical measurements but pixels are restricted to whole numbers.

     

    We receive art at varying resolutions, but our trap widths are consistent, so we set our trap width in mm to ensure accuracy and consistentcy.

    Inspiring
    April 8, 2026

    here is an example:

     

     

    Sameer K
    Community Manager
    Community Manager
    February 25, 2026

    Hey, ​@vladan_1911. Welcome to the Photoshop Community. I'll help you figure this out. Based on the limited description, I’ve been unable to recreate this. Please share a video of the issue and the system info from Photoshop Help > System Info. Copy and paste it into a text document, then upload and attach it here.

     

    Please test and confirm if Photoshop (Beta) has an issue. You can get Photoshop (Beta) from the Creative Cloud > Apps tab > Beta Apps section. 

     

    Thanks! 
    Sameer K

    (Type '@' and type my name to mention me when you reply)

    vladan_1911
    Participant
    February 25, 2026

    @Sameer K 

    Thanks for the reply, as you can see in the attached pictures that the traping (darker edge on the objects in the pictures) is bigger in 27.4 and BETA versions than the 27.3.1 relese for the same given values (O.05mm).

    Sameer K
    Community Manager
    Community Manager
    March 5, 2026

    Hey, ​@vladan_1911. Thanks for adding the system info, and the images. Could you include a video showing your steps that result in the difference in output? 

    Thanks!

    Sameer K