Skip to main content
TROZANME
Participating Frequently
August 11, 2025
Open for Voting

Feature Request: Workflow & Customization Improvements for Adobe Audition

  • August 11, 2025
  • 4 replies
  • 127 views

Hello Adobe Audition Team,

On behalf of professional audio editors across post-production, broadcasting, animation, music, and podcasting, we request several key features that would make Adobe Audition more competitive and efficient for large-scale audio work.

Audition is already a reliable DAW for editing, mixing, and restoration, but there are modern workflow tools present in other professional audio software that would significantly speed up production and organization for thousands of users.


Requested Features

  1. Bins / Folder Structure in Files Panel

    • Create and manage folders (bins) in the Files panel to organize assets like Voice, SFX, Music.

    • Drag-and-drop between bins, search inside bins, and filter by tags.

  2. Track Folders with FX Inheritance

    • Collapsible folder tracks to group related tracks (e.g., all character voices, or all ambient SFX).

    • Apply effects, automation, or routing at the folder level that affect all child tracks.

  3. Per-Clip / Per-Item Effects

    • Apply effects directly to individual clips without affecting the entire track.

    • Non-destructive and editable at any time.

  4. Advanced Delete Silence Tool

    • Adjustable padding, RMS/LUFS-based detection, and the option to process multiple clips or tracks at once.

    • Ability to visually preview silence detection before applying.

  5. Ripple Editing Enhancements

    • Ripple edit across multiple selected tracks in the Multitrack Editor.

    • Option to lock track sync groups so edits shift all related audio in sync.

  6. Custom Actions / Macros

    • Ability to record or build multi-step actions (macros) and apply them instantly.

    • Include auto-apply effects chains to tracks in the Multitrack Editor as part of these actions.

  7. Render Queue & Batch Export

    • Queue multiple mixes or stems to export overnight.

    • Save batch export presets for different delivery formats.

  8. Enhanced Bus & Mixer Features

    • Reorder buses, hide/show specific buses in the mixer, and assign colors/icons.

    • Multi-bus sends and pre/post-fader send options.

  9. Direct Video Export from Audition

    • Export video formats directly from Audition (like Premiere Pro) without needing Adobe Media Encoder.

    • Saves memory and time, especially for quick review renders or short-form content.

  10. User Scripting & Customization

    • Support for user scripts to automate repetitive tasks.

    • More customizable interface layouts to match different workflows (e.g., VO editing, multitrack mixing, restoration).


Why This Matters:
For professionals handling complex, multi-hour sessions — such as episodic animation, long-form interviews, and film post-production — these features would drastically improve editing speed, maintain cleaner projects, and reduce repetitive manual work.

Many of these improvements already exist in other professional creative software — adding them to Audition would ensure it remains the preferred choice for editors who want both Adobe’s ecosystem and modern audio editing power.


Thank you for considering these requests on behalf of the wider audio editing community. These features would make a meaningful difference to the daily workflow of thousands of professionals worldwide.

Sincerely,

Santosh Mareddy
The Professional Audio Editing Community

4 replies

SteveG_AudioMasters_
Community Expert
Community Expert
August 11, 2025

Look, I told it like it is, which you clearly can't deal with. And for your information, I am not an Adobe employee.

 

But you are correct; you are under a very naive impression of how this works. Do I think it's a good model? Of course not, but unfortunately it appears to be the one that continues to pay Adobe's salary bill.

 

I'll spell it out for you. If you are an editor working for a corporation that buys into Adobe software, then it's the buying staff in your institution that you need to be lobbying for features, not a powerless U2U group - which is effectively all we are here.

TROZANME
TROZANMEAuthor
Participating Frequently
August 11, 2025

Time to switch Bubye Buddy 

TROZANME
TROZANMEAuthor
Participating Frequently
August 11, 2025

Oh, thank you so much for explaining how us regular working editors apparently don’t count for anything. I was under the silly impression that feedback from the people who actually use the software every single day mattered — but clearly, unless we’re part of some corporate whale with a fat Adobe bill, we’re just background noise to you.

 

Good to know that features aren’t added because they’d improve the workflow for thousands of professionals worldwide — no, they’re only added if a few 'big ticket' customers grace Adobe with their wish list.

So much for innovation — sounds more like glorified gatekeeping.

 

And thanks for pointing out that one of the features was ‘specifically removed.’ I’m sure it had nothing to do with forcing people into Adobe Media Encoder and eating up even more system resources — because obviously, user convenience is the last thing on the priority list.

 

Also, maybe the reason Adobe’s stock has dropped nearly 30% from its peak is because the company seems more interested in pleasing a handful of corporate accounts than keeping all of its users happy.

 

If this is the attitude, it’s no wonder Audition feels like it’s stuck in 2010 while other DAWs have left it in the dust. But hey, keep telling the rest of us how little we matter — that’ll really keep the loyal user base sticking around."

SteveG_AudioMasters_
Community Expert
Community Expert
August 11, 2025

Having read that list, it's reasonably clear that you have no idea of what's already in Audition at all - and at least one of your 'features' was quite specifically removed (the video export).

 

The other thing is, I don't think that you realise how features get added. It's not because you ask for them - it's entirely down to whether the big ticked users would be prepared to pay for them when presented with options. If they won't, then it's very unlikely to happen, because they're the ones paying the bills.