Skip to main content
Inspiring
January 12, 2017
In Development

P: Camera Raw/Lightroom Classic/Lightroom Ecosystem: Support for WebP

  • January 12, 2017
  • 72 replies
  • 17008 views

I'm preparing a bunch of files for the web and would like to use Google's WebP format. How can I export photos in Lightroom to WebP?

72 replies

JohanElzenga
Community Expert
Community Expert
January 5, 2025

He didn't say anything about importing WebP images. He wants to export some images in WebP format.

 

-- Johan W. Elzenga
Participant
January 5, 2025

How did you get webp into LRC in the first place?  I have been trying to import .webp for years.  My inability to do so is the main reason I want to dump Adobe forever.

Participating Frequently
January 5, 2025

@johnrellis suggested in a post that it might be possible to add the Google Convert code somehow as a Post Processing option in Lightroom.

 

I would like to get the highest resolution, and best quality but produce very small sized WebP images to be used on a website.

 

I would like the photos to be sized 1200 x 900 with a DPI of 72, and quality of 80%.

 

I use a Windows 10 desktop.

 

The procedure I plan to use is

 

  • Within Lightroom, use the Develop module
    • to adjust all the parameters such as exposure, colour etc.
    • crop to aspect 1200 x 900
    • export as TIFF and select
    • Image Sizing – 1200 x 900 pixels, Resolution 72 DPI
      • Output sharpening un-ticked

 

There is a Post Processing option in this Lightroom Export screen

 

@johnrellis suggested in a post that it might be possible to add the Google Convert code somehow as a Post Processing option in Lightroom.

 

Has anybody ever done this… or could explain the steps needed to set this up?

Yoga Holidays and Retreats
Participating Frequently
January 4, 2025

How can I export a photo as WebP from Lightroom Classic?

 

I have a few hundred photos I need to export as WebP.

 

I don't want to have to export them as jpg, and then open each one in Photoshop in order to save them as WebP.

 

Could someone let me know the steps to do this please?

 

Thanks in advance,

Dave

 

Yoga Holidays and Retreats
JohanElzenga
Community Expert
Community Expert
January 4, 2025

You have no choice, Lightroom Classic does not support WebP export. Photoshop has batch options using Actions however, so you do not have to open them one by one, but could run an action that saves as WebP on all images in batch. https://www.ias.edu/itg/content/editing-batch-images-photoshop

 

-- Johan W. Elzenga
Participating Frequently
January 4, 2025

Hi Johan, 

Thanks for replying so quickly.

Would you know how to get the best quality image doing these two steps? 

First exporting out of Lightroom in which format?  And then doing the bath conversion to WebP using photoshop.  Would it be best to export from Lightroom in png format?

Hard to believe that Abobe has not built this feature into Lightroom yet.

Best Wishes,

Dave

 

 

Yoga Holidays and Retreats
Known Participant
November 3, 2024

There's an apple in with them oranges. HEIC may have some compression, but it's basically huge (and it's the default on an iOS device, making for nice fat cloud accounts using lots of electricity, ahem). Among the compressed formats, WebP seems to be the best right now, and is widely adopted, so it would make sense for image-organizing software to support it.

Participating Frequently
October 28, 2024

This is not an ideal solution and may I join the chorus of people calling for Adobe to catch up with our needs?  If you have a WordPress website there are plugins that you can use that will automatically convert to webp. I have it running on my website: here is my corporate photography page with quite a few images, if you open on of the images and try to save it you will see that they are webp however I uploaded only jpg.   

 

'Adobe', there are so many alternatives coming to market now, you guys need to be on the front foot 😉 

Participant
September 27, 2024

What am I missing?  Does not Adobe Systems claim to be the world leader in digital image processing software?  Apparently, without using a lame plug-in like "anyfile", I have to go through all kinds of gyrations to import a very large percentage of photos in the known universe.

If this is true, everyone ever involved with Adobe Lightroom Classic needs to be fired.  Immediately.

Also, LRC absolutely SUCKS for video.  I want to dump Adobe LRC very much.

Thank you for the endless hours of extra work and frustration.  Please send me a product survey.

Legend
July 5, 2024

Part of the problem is that numerous formats have been put forward to replace JPEG, including PNG, WebP, JPEG XL, JPEG 2000, HIEC, and AVIF. Each has its merits but its still a horse race. WebP has been pushed by Google and HEIC is now the default image format for iOS so you have competing commercial interests. Compatability is all over the place, and while some devices (desktop computers, cell phones) can be easily updated, many others cannot.

I suspect that HEIC and AVIF will be the formats to win out but who knows.

GermanKiwi
Participating Frequently
July 3, 2024
quote

Hi, I'm interested to know the benefits of webp?   Is the picture quality any better than jpeg and why use it, I'm keen to know?  I found this converter https://cloudconvert.com/jpg-to-webp if that helps at all.

 

The main benefit is that webp images have a significantly smaller file size compared to JPGs with the same compression and image quality. As a result, websites that use webp images load much faster in the browser.

 

There are literally dozens, if not hundreds, of existing JPG-to-WEBP converters available on the internet, as well as in virtually all other leading image editing applications - including Photoshop itself. This forum thread doesn't exist because we're lacking the ability to convert images to webp - rather, it exists because we specifically need and want Lightroom itself to "catch up with the times" and support exporting images to webp natively.

 

Saving an image first to JPG, and then converting it to webp as a second step - eg. using an online converter - results in two instances of lossy compression, which degrades the image quality. It's always better to export natively to the target image format, directly from the source.