Skip to main content
Dats
Participating Frequently
January 14, 2020
Open for Voting

P: Demosiacing is falling behind and needs improvement

  • January 14, 2020
  • 13 replies
  • 1771 views

Hi there,

Maybe I am a pixel peeper, but as of 2020, my observations are that Lightroom's demosaicing is falling way behind competitors and doesn't recover as much detail as, for example, CaptureOne or RawTherapee. Together with fairly average sharpening and denoising, the final result is so mushy compared to what you can get elsewhere with just a snap of your fingers, that it's just frustrating and urges me to look for a replacement.

Here is a 200% crop of a photo taken on Nikon D5100 as demosaiced by RawTherapee's AMaZE VS Lightroom (all sharpening, denoising and corrections turned off in both). See how much crisper and detailed is the AMaZE version?



It's literally free resolution! Well, technically, the Lr's version is "lost resolution" - you are not getting from your gear what you paid for it.

Can Adobe do something about this? I mean, adopting AMaZE demosaicing from the open-source shouldn't be too hard, right? That would be already a significant improvement. Please?

Cheers!

13 replies

Known Participant
January 14, 2020
Sergei, it may be that the details were lost in the translation but I don't see any difference between the RT and Lr examples you gave. At least on my monitor.
Inspiring
January 14, 2020
it is a great feature, which unfortunately forces everybody (even those with RTX2080 GPUs) to create massive, massive (linear+ sized) DNG files instead of letting users with powerful GPUs to do that type demosaick w/o creating intermediate DNGs... I am using on-line backups and to deal with extra huge DNGs is too much... address that first
Rikk Flohr_Photography
Community Manager
Community Manager
January 14, 2020
It might be useful, Sergei to compare an Enhanced Details version as part of your comparison. Have you evaluated this feature?
Rikk Flohr: Adobe Photography Org