Skip to main content
areohbee
Legend
April 24, 2011
Open for Voting

P: Make All Adjustments Local

  • April 24, 2011
  • 54 replies
  • 1744 views

I'd like all adjustments to be available locally (i.e. maskable, and ability to apply with different settings).

(This hasn't been explicitly suggest yet on this "forum", has it?)

54 replies

Participant
May 5, 2011
Only if there is a fix for the poor performance when using the adjstment brush.
areohbee
areohbeeAuthor
Legend
May 5, 2011
Although I'd even like to be able to apply camera calibration profiles locally, and lens corrections, and even color noise reduction, I realize some things may require bigger design changes and trade-offs than others. I'm OK with *some* things being global if "necessary", so:

Priorities:
-----------
1. Lum. Noise Reduction *and* Sharpening Parameters (not just amount) (I now see these as parts of the same whole).
2. Color Adjustment (e.g. HSL, WB)
3. Tone Curve
Inspiring
April 30, 2011
I agree that all adjustments should be localisable. A performance penalty should only occur for those using computing intensive adjustments.

If it has to be a subset of controls, creative sharpening and HSL control are ones that should be high up the list (The latter has been suggested as an idea already).
Inspiring
April 24, 2011
The implementation details might (or might not) result in a performance penalty for additional local adjustments, therefore I'd prefer to prioritize mine. I think the team is well aware that having everything localizable is a desirable thing, but if (!) there is a penalty, I'd prefer WB and NR to be top of the list. Creative sharpening is, I feel, important as well, but it might be a separate item (or not) from the local adjustments.