P: More Photoshop like clone/healing/content aware brushes

Check out Generative Fill with Firefly technology in the May release!

It would be wonderful if with other recent improvements in LR Classic, the development team would improve the spot removal tool to work as well as it does in Photoshop.  There are so many tools that now work as well in LRC as they do in PS.  Somehow, spot removal has been overlooked.  

No Status

Under consideration for 10 years!!?  Surely this needs to be 'addressed'!  I have added my 'Upvote'.

the spot removal on Lightroom works only on very special cases and has nothing to do with the functionality of the clone tool in photoshop

There's an idea here for you to upvote. I believe it's a similar request Lightroom and Camera Raw: More Photoshop like clone/healing/content aware brushes | Adobe Photoshop Family. It has 355 votes but it's almost 10yrs old. It's also "under consideration".

Just for me to understand. What is for you "limited performance" ? The speed to find a source area ? The quality of the area found ? The performance solwdown when you have 50 of them ? 

As many photographers, my workflow involves both lightroom and photoshop. For many images the only reason of going from ligtroom to photoshop has to do with the very limited performance of spot removal on lightroom. I was wandering if you are planning on the future to enhance its functionality in order to speed up photographers' workflow.

Thank you for your reply

Tip: heal and clone at 200%. 

BTW, I tried the latest tool in PS and it left an outline in the location of the deleted object. Sort of OK because after returning to Lightroom, it was easy to use heal or clone to clean it up. 

Recommendation: ignore that strong statements in this forum about always using heal or clone. In any situation, one will always work better than the other. For my shooting, clone works best about 80-90% of the time while for you, the reverse might be true.