Skip to main content
Inspiring
July 8, 2010
Open for Voting

P: Ability to lock photos to prevent further editing

  • July 8, 2010
  • 75 replies
  • 9170 views

I'm a relatively newbie to Lightroom and I think it is fantastic.

It does occur to me that pros who have been using Lightroom for a while understand all the issues about selections, settings, copying, pasting, synchronising etc etc.

Like many things in life the people who do things almost as second nature forget what it was like to be a beginner.

The one thing that has surprised me about lightroom is that I cannot find a way of indicating "I am happy with this - I just want to lock it to ensure I don't damage, amend or delete it" through my own incompetence.

75 replies

johnrellis
Legend
May 17, 2018
Oops, that plugin only protects against deletion, not the other kinds of changes you described.
johnrellis
Legend
May 17, 2018
johnrellis
Legend
May 17, 2018
Participating Frequently
May 17, 2018


The proposed LR feature is to allow us to Lock Image Sates to prevent unintended edits, and to allow Deliberate Unlocking of images to permit edits.

LR offers keystroke shortcuts to do complicated things, as most of us now enjoy, thereby risking that a few keystrokes can exert unintended, and unnoticed, edits on huge numbers of files. Aside from Shortcuts, even a delete key could wipe out, for example, Keyword fields that required great effort to create. Unintended edits can escape notice for prolonged periods, so simply reverting to a Catalog Backup is not a good solution. I speak from experience of noting my own errors, only months afterwards.

While it's natural that each of us is zealous about a feature that we most want, I'll argue that the ability to Lock Images represents an overdue Catalog safety feature.

John Caldwell
johnrellis
Legend
October 24, 2017
As a workaround, consider the PhotoSafe plugin.
Known Participant
October 24, 2017


Often clients want a few low res images immediately after the shoot (for social media, etc.) and I'll deliver these immediately. Then, later that week I will edit the whole job for final delivery as carefully culled and edited high res files. I live in fear that when I come back and edit I will cull from the final edit an image I've already shown to the client as a low res file. I would love a feature that allows me to lock an image from being deleted from the catalog (or marked x) or in any way changed. Something to make sure that image is protected in the exact state the client has already seen. Yes I could give it five stars or mark it a particular color, but ratings and colors are something that I could easily change during the culling process. I want something like a LOCK where you have to go and affirmatively UNLOCK before further changing anything about or moving the image.
Known Participant
June 14, 2017
Another vote for locking an image to protect it from deletion.  Sometimes I will provide a sneak peek to a client immediately after the shoot or maybe the client will look at the laptop and pick some favorites during the shoot and it's absolutely imperative that these shots don't get somehow edited out.  I would absolutely love some sort of tool that would prevent locked images from being moved and/or altered. This would be fabulous. As it is I do all sorts of things like apply colors and stars, but when I'm editing a job with thousands of images it's so easy to miss a label and delete something by mistake.
Steve Gandy
Inspiring
June 6, 2017


An idea for a Lightroom feature would be a switch that would lock an image from further editing in the Develop Module. I have PSDs and some TIFs that are archival. It would be nice to protect them from myself from further editing. 
Steve GandyPhotographer - Instructorstevegandy.com
Participant
November 17, 2016
Oh, I didn't mean to imply that LR doesn't need locking.  It definitely does. 
I was just sharing my workaround. 
Inspiring
November 17, 2016
i use all my color labels for other thing already.. and its not fool proof.