Skip to main content
Inspiring
April 20, 2011
Open for Voting

P: More sophisticated slideshows please

  • April 20, 2011
  • 17 replies
  • 528 views

I was asked to post this commentary here having first posted it in Help for Slideshow; I think they didn't want to deal with me. But, here goes. The Slideshow module is probably the most important sharing component of your program for those of us choosing not to print and file photos. Yet, and in spite of its few "canned" graphics, it seems to lack many useful edit features; at least ones equal to the quality of pictures that Lr3 can help produce. 1. Though Lr3 allows movie clips to be imported, "slideshow" will not play them as part of a combined show. 2. Although a soundtrack can be added, adjusting play time is by means of a primitive slider. 3. Sountrack only allows one track to be imported. That's probably okay if one knows how to create a track somewhere else (Garage Band, et. al.) and import it for longer shows with subtle shifts in content or, if one is willing to put up with a loop that may not match the show in length. 4. The soundtrack does not mate to the show which means the show cannot be stopped and restarted because the soundtrack defaults to the beginning regardless of the image one has stopped at; this is a pain in the @$$ for the editing process because it means one must run a complete show each time a make minor adjustments of timing, as may be required; and that can mean many hours if the show is anything like 20 minutes.
I am sure that I am not alone in wanting to share my high quality, Lr3 images on a high quality TV or digital projector, where a small group can see the show together. I don't wish to print images or books of images to pass around and later have to store. And, I don't want to use the default "iphoto," "iDVD" program combo, which allows movies and stills in the same show and easier adjustments to match images to a soundtrack. Why? Because it is a weaker aid to creating quality images to begin with and the quality is lost when transferred to a DVD.
So help us out here. Fix these problems or . . . maybe I just don't know how to get at what's already available in Lr3 and you can tell me. Some of us want our albums on DVD with all the bells and whistles and we want the tools to make them as rich an experience as possible.

Thanks for your patience.

J. Naughton

17 replies

areohbee
Legend
October 12, 2013
There are excellent slideshow apps which don't require one-photo-at-a-time. Don't get me wrong, I'd like to see Lr slideshow improved, but in the mean time, consider creating in specialized slideshow app, instead of Photoshop/Premiere...
Participant
October 12, 2013
Just upgraded to LR 5 from LR 3. I'm floored that there still has never been any sort of meaningful update to the slideshow module.

Assume you want to make a slideshow for a funeral. (That's probably what most people actually do with slideshows anyway).

As it is now, if you want any sort of decent slideshow, your have to do it one photo at a time, in Photoshop or Premiere.

I would like to see some simple automated animations - such as the Ken Burns effect, directly in LR.

This functionality is already in Aperture. I'm unclear why Adobe would not make at least similar functionality, let alone better.
Participant
June 11, 2013
you could paint the whole thing in 100% and then lower the opacity? i know you cant use what is underneath to guide you but its one way of doing it without the layers. 😃
areohbee
Legend
April 21, 2011
"If you're serious about this please make it a separate post" - I already did. Hopefully everyone understands *this* FR/Idea is for slideshow enhancement, not separate modules...
areohbee
Legend
April 21, 2011
"If you're serious about this please make it a separate post" - I already did. Hopefully everyone understands *this* FR/Idea is for slideshow enhancement, not separate modules...
Inspiring
April 21, 2011
If you're serious about this please make it a separate post. I like the suggestion and I'm voting for it, but am NOT necessarily voting for separate modules.
john beardsworth
Community Expert
Community Expert
April 21, 2011
"I think of Lightroom as the hub of my workflow, not a "one-stop shop". If their intention is the latter..."

See forum description: "Adobe® Photoshop® Lightroom® 3 .... edit, manage, and showcase your images from one shot to an entire shoot all from one blazing fast application."
areohbee
Legend
April 21, 2011
I too use several applications along with Lightroom. I think of Lightroom as the hub of my workflow, not a "one-stop shop". If their intention is the latter, then they're not quite making it. I apologize if I've diverted your thread - but I can imagine Adobe saying to themselves "we just don't have the resources to do a kickin' slideshow module, along with everything else, come Lr4 - not for a $100 upgrade anyway". Seems worth consideration to charge more for a swingin' slideshow module, and hire a new employee or consultant to work on it if need be... I hear other great requests for things like built-in DLNA server (yeah, like that's ever gonna be built into Lr anytime soon without charging extra for it, or having it implemented by a plugin...). I mean if 3rd parties could write true module plugins (or any other tightly integrated plugins), then that would be another route, but at the moment, they can't...
Inspiring
April 21, 2011
With a program as powerful yet easy to use at image altering and one that offers a separate but, apparently equal, slideshow feature, one's expectations are high. Given the resources and product features Adobe has elsewhere, Lr3 slideshow is a poor offering. Splitting the modules and making them each more robust might be an answer that would allow individuals to tailor their own photo application. As it is, I find myself limping along using Lr3, Garageband, Final Cut and way too much work around time to achieve what adobe appeared to promise in one location.
john beardsworth
Community Expert
Community Expert
April 21, 2011
Butch, my concern is less about adding new ones (why not?) and more about removing ones that are integral to the program's concept