Skip to main content
Inspiring
December 2, 2010
Not Prioritized

P: Provide support for Linux

  • December 2, 2010
  • 325 replies
  • 12607 views

Lightroom for Linux - is it possible? Most my friends and I need it, because of not using Windows and current Linux tools can't get so great instruments for raw preprocessing and organizing...

325 replies

Known Participant
February 25, 2016
Also, how to migrate my Lightroom catalogues to Darktable catalogues? Given that DT works in a similar fashion...

I haven't looked at Darktable at all yet, but I just can't imagine it's anywhere near Lightroom. Perhaps it works for you, because perhaps it does your thingies very well, but everyone uses LR in a different way, and given "linux alternatives" (so to speak) for other popular commercial software, like Photoshop->GIMP, I can't imagine it being very good even without ever touching it, sorry to say.
Participating Frequently
February 25, 2016
I've tried Darktable on numerous occasions, almost with every update, but I just can't get used to the interface. I had much less trouble with getting used to Linux when switching from Windows and Mac than I have had with Darktable 😞
Participating Frequently
February 25, 2016
I'm using it since more than 2 years now. See what can be done with it:

http://studio.obry.net

Not bad?

See also: http://www.rileybrandt.com/2015/10/15/foss-photo-flow-2015/

And there is many video tutorials on the net. Be sure to check them, the power of darktable comes with a bit of complexity. It is quite different to what Lr does and propose for example. It has taken me some time to grasp it.
Participating Frequently
February 25, 2016
Thanks!
i saw darktable before, but didn't think that this software is mature enough.

will try it now!
Participating Frequently
February 25, 2016
Well I've been a proponent of the Lr for Linux since a very very long time. Don't remember if this thread has been started by me, there was so many to ask for a Linux port.

But the good news is that today I just don't need that. I'm using (as some professional photographers now) darktable on a daily basis which is on many aspects better than Lightroom. So why hanging there... At least give darktable a try!
Known Participant
February 25, 2016
So at least it's not a huge technical hurdle. It appears to come down to the willingness to invest time and capacity from within the business.

I'm not so sure Linux users would cast their vote here though. Many of them don't care about LR as long as it doesn't run on 'their' platform, and I suspect most Windows/Mac users don't either as long as LR keeps running as it does. It's a classic chicken/egg problem.

Otoh, I'm sure the same dilemma existed when Photoshop was orginally ported over to Windows, back in the day...
Known Participant
February 24, 2016
Well, fair is fair, ChromeOS is essentially a very expensive browser. And making something for ChromeOS is OS-agnostic: you're developing for a browser, not for an OS.

But it does prove that Adobe is able to develop for platforms other than Windows and OSX. I should count in the mobile versions of PS and LR as well, even though they are hugely crippled in every aspect. But again, it does prove Adobe's ability. Now just for their willingness.
Inspiring
January 29, 2016
I think the fact that Linux does not have enough place in the market share because its users are low is not a solid argument. It is like the 'chicken and egg' argument of which came first. I think Linux users would increase if there were more mainstream software available. People love Mac and claim they are more stable and Adobe products run 'faster' on those systems. I think Adobe on Linux would outperform them all. I think when Linux changes to using Wayland or MIR that this will much more possible and easier to develop. I would definitely switch from Windows 10 to use Ubuntu if Adobe products were available. They are making Photoshop for the Chrome OS, I think it can be done for Linux too. Are there really that much more Chrome OS computers being used than Linux?
jackdaw
Participating Frequently
January 22, 2016
Hi Dan. Same for me. I'm also a professional photographer, and also a webdesigner. I worked with both Windows and Apple for years, but switched to Linux about 8 years ago and never want to go back. It's a great system and also great to be sitting behind a computer instead of a machine that is always telling you 'Look at how pretty I am! I'm Windows, or I'm Apple!'
I also would like to have LR as an option, although I'm now using Aftershot Pro which is also really good. Nevertheless, ity's always nice to have a choice :).

This was my first setup by the way: https://www.jacktummers.nl/ubuntu-stu... (in dutch, so you would have to translate it, if you want) At the moment I'm using Linux Mint.
Inspiring
January 22, 2016
I'm a professional photographer and have been using GIMP which is excellent on Linux. I choose Linux because it's actually safer to have my shots stored on that platform than it is Windows.

Ubuntu runs much quicker too.

I'd love to have PS / LR as another option. I hate the fact it's the only thing missing from my Ubuntu set up.

Please get some Linux support going. This BS about fragmentation is nuts .. How come GIMP runs on all flavors as does Chrome. As does Libre Office etc.