Skip to main content
Known Participant
September 11, 2026
Open for Voting

P: XMP sidecar files to be availeble for DNG

  • September 11, 2026
  • 3 replies
  • 35 views

DNG should be able to have sidecar .xmp file for the edits we do in LR classic.

 

it would speed up the backing up process

it would preserve the integrity of the files

it would preserve the life span of ssd and hdd

it would make the workflow with different raw files from different brands more consistent.

It would prevent the original creation date of the file from being changed, thereby avoiding mistakes when synchronizing or overwriting files with the same name but from different years.Since synchronization is primarily based on the file name and creation date, this is particularly important for professional photographers. We only have 9,999 numbers available in the file naming system, so it is common for RAW and DNG files from different years to have the same numerical file name. In these cases, the original creation date is the only reliable parameter the computer has to distinguish between them and prevent the wrong file from being overwritten.

I am hoping this discussion gets some support the only threat on the topic is 11 years old and last activity is 6 year old. I really hope Adobe bring this easy feature to LR

    3 replies

    Califdan2
    Inspiring
    September 11, 2026

    This is why I stopped converting my RAW files to DNG’s during import.  the backup overhead was not worth the 10-20% reduction in disk space per image

    Community Expert
    September 11, 2026

    These are among the reasons why I have for years avoided converting my camera Raw files to DNG at import (or subsequently). Instead, those remain in the proprietary format for the camera used. LrC does not store edit metadata within that, therefore a separate XMP is employed.

    There is a preferences setting as to whether (very exceptionally) corrections to capture date applied in the Catalog should then be written out into a proprietary Raw - not only into its XMP sidecar - or whether LrC must even in those circumstances leave the Raw completely alone..  

    Many people prefer the reverse: they actively like seeing no separate XMP file alongside a DNG converted image. That is among the reasons why they will advocate converting.

    As a complication to the above simple system - some cameras shoot natively in DNG. Also some recent LrC tools generate a separate quasi-Raw file which includes some processing, and this is always saved to disk as a DNG (without giving any option).

    So to manage those cases: I would agree, the option to force external XMP only seems like a sensible option to provide. This will, though, require a review of XMP file naming since currently, if you see a Raw and a JPG and an XMP all reflecting the same filename otherwise, the XMP is safely presumed to associate to the Raw. If JPGs might similarly receive an XMP when metadata was written out to them, such a presumption could not be made!

    Known Participant
    September 11, 2026

    yes, I am well aware. Till now I see that xmp got an extension depending on the file format if the share.

    for exemple

    01.CR3

    01.xmp

    01.ARW

    01.ARW.xmp