Skip to main content
Inspiring
October 27, 2018
Open for Voting

P: Assign People tags to pictures that were missed

  • October 27, 2018
  • 172 replies
  • 13108 views

Once the indexing has been completed and Lightroom CC has found all the potential faces, it would be nice to have the ability to add People Tags to pictures that were "missed" where no faces were recognized.  The idea of People Tags is to be able to search for people and generate all potential results.  Right now it's messy because you have to resort to keyword tags to identify people that were missed with facial recognition and makes searching and cataloging a tedious task.

172 replies

georgiosa42941452
Participant
November 8, 2021

What is this? You merged my post in a general thread about face recognition and problem solved?

 

Nice customer support. You know that we pay for this product, right?

georgiosa42941452
Participant
November 5, 2021

The problem is very simple: photos that contain clear faces remain unrecognized.

 

Moreover, there is no way to inform lightroom that a specific photo contains a face.

 

Unfortunately, the face recognition feature is unreliable.

Rikk Flohr_Photography
Community Manager
October 28, 2021

If/When an answer changes, the thread will be updated and the status changed. 

The threads are merged to give a single source for Product Management to evaluate feature requests.

 

Rikk Flohr: Adobe Photography Org
Timothy.Spear
Inspiring
October 28, 2021

@dank87557784 

 

No issue.

 

@Rikk Flohr: Photography 

 

Any chance at an answer. And since you (or another Adobe employee) merged all these threads together, has the answer changed?

 

Tim

Participating Frequently
October 28, 2021

Apologies Tim, I should be specific...I'm asking this of Adobe, and specifically, Rikk Flohr, or another Adobe employee that is being notified of these updates.  I've Upvoted this issue and others, but don't know that it really makes a difference.  The person that started this three years ago KNOWS it doesn't make a difference.

Timothy.Spear
Inspiring
October 28, 2021

Since I do not work for Adobe, I cannot answer any of those questions.

However, I have seen Adobe respond to customer pressure and interest. So, Adobe employees have stated multiple times the way to get visibility of an issue is to upvote it.

So, that is all we can do, unless you have connections others of us do not.

Tim

 

Participating Frequently
October 28, 2021

I'm not sure you're answering my question.  Why would this be marked as "Declined" if there wasn't internal discussion where the functionality was considered and rejected?  I'm asking specifically why the status was changed to "Declined"?  Given that this functionality is available in other similar Adobe products, this entry has been open for at least three years, and most people taking the time to post stated they would not use the application until the issue was addressed, I'm curious specifically what the issue was with incorporating this functionality into the product.

 

Also, for future reference, is there internal review criteria that we customers should be aware of?  As a user of the Adobe Support Community area, I would like to understand the Upvote thresholds for my entries to get any sort of visibility.  Is this entry close....like 110 votes gets another re-assessment...or is the criteria 1000, or 10,000, or 100,000 upvotes before this would be re-assessed?

 

Timothy.Spear
Inspiring
October 27, 2021

@dank87557784 

 

Make sure to upvote the issue.

Adobe often states they look at the number of upvotes an issue gets ot find the importance of it. And besides ranting on here, this is really the only thing we can do. So upvote it, and get your friends to also!

 

Tim

Participating Frequently
October 27, 2021

What is the rational behind this being declined?  Please be specific.

 

Dan

Timothy.Spear
Inspiring
September 1, 2021

@Patbeau 

 

In the joined thread, that is the thrust of the conversation; being able to track images against the people feature; even when Sensai fails to find the individual.

 

I did break it down into more details above of the value for specific parts of the functionality if you are very curious..

 

Tim