Skip to main content
Sean Clarke
Participant
October 19, 2017
Open for Voting

P: Import maintaining folder structure

  • October 19, 2017
  • 31 replies
  • 3448 views

As I've spent years sorting all of my photographs out into folders and sub-folders I naturally want to maintain that in Lightroom CC.

How can I import hundreds of different folders and sub-folders into Lightroom CC and maintain their structure?

Even when importing from an existing Lightroom Classic Catalog, there doesn't seem to be a way to automatically maintain the folder structure.

I don't want to add 50,000+ photographs and have to re-organise them

Any thoughts ??

31 replies

Victoria Bampton LR Queen
Community Expert
Community Expert
November 24, 2017
Hi Laura, sorry for the delay getting back to you. It's been one of those weeks!

There's not an easy clean solution here. They technology's just not reached that point yet. Thoughts that spring to mind:
  • If you only needed 2560px smart previews, I'd say sync the collections you're going to need from the Classic catalog and put CC on your laptop for editing. That's the clean automatic simple route, but wouldn't give you full res on your laptop, so Photoshop editing would be out.
  • If LRCC has all the tools you need, apart from folder management, this might be a silly idea, but have you considered employing a teenager for a few hours to do the work of converting your folder structure into an album structure? It's a one-time job, as you'd put new photos directly into CC, so would be the cleanest solution.
  • There are very unofficial workarounds for getting originals to the Adobe cloud and continuing to use Classic, but they'd still require you to rebuild your folder structure as albums/folders.
  • Otherwise, you're down to non-Adobe-cloud solutions, like putting the catalog and photos on an external drive, and using file sync software (like Chronosync) to keep it copied back another external drive permanently hooked up to your iMac, so it can get into your Backblaze backup and you're not risking your originals by carrying around your only copy. 
Victoria - The Lightroom Queen
laurab78462711
Participant
November 21, 2017
I do use Photoshop some on my MacBook -- usually for intermediate edits that I find cumbersome in Lr. Any of my fine art images that will require extensive editing, I do on my desktop.

Yes, I do usually know in advance what I'll want to edit, but not 100% of the time. And I occasionally need to access old originals even when I don't need to edit them. For example, I was at a conference recently and realized that I should quickly print some of my older work to create a separate portfolio than the one I had already brought with me; a reviewer asked to see more than I had brought printed. 
Victoria Bampton LR Queen
Community Expert
Community Expert
November 21, 2017
When you're editing on your MacBook, are you just in Lightroom, or do you need to switch to Photoshop on that one too?  Just Develop type editing? And I'm guessing you know in advance which jobs you're likely to want access to on the MacBook? There's a few ideas that come to mine (I documented them in my book), but I just want to make sure I recommend the best one for you.
Victoria - The Lightroom Queen
laurab78462711
Participant
November 21, 2017
Hi, Victoria. Thanks for helping me sort this out. I don't know all of Lr's features, so it may be that my system is totally convoluted. I'm happy to hear suggestions.

I use Lr to organize and do basic edits to all of my photos, then do more specialized editing in Photoshop as needed. I do most of my editing on my 27" iMac, but sometimes need to edit on my MacBook. This requires that I use an external hard drive to store my originals, because I have to move it back and forth between the two. I never edit on a mobile device; my iPad is too old to make that workable.

Workflow:

  • When I have new photos on a memory card, I use Copy/Add to import them into Lr and copy them to folders on my hard drive.
  •  Within each of my main folders, I have dozens of subfolders, each of which can have dozens more -- sometimes 8-10 layers deep.  Here is an example of the minimum I end up with for just one event:
          20171118. IL State Fair
                   20171118. IL State Fair. unedited
                   20171118. IL State Fair. edited
                   20171118. IL State Fair. edited watermarked
  • I use star ratings to sort my photos and indicate the stages of editing until they are fully completed and ready to export into the two edited folders.
  • For my client jobs, once they are done I upload their photos to albums on PhotoShelter. That typically happens very close to the event itself -- always within a week.
  • BUT I mix in working on my personal projects as I have time and inclination. I don't need access to every single old photo I have at all times, but it would be nice.

Problems with that setup:
  • I hate the risk inherent to carrying around so many original files.
  • I desperately need to use a cloud-based service (like Backblaze) as a triple backup, but that works only if I keep the hard drive plugged into my desktop so that the files can be synched periodically. That means I have to have one location with enough storage for all of my originals, and can't keep unplugging an external drive to move it back and forth.

I changed my Adobe subscription so that I would have Lr CC with 2TB of storage. I thought I would be able to import my photos in their existing folder structure, as I was able to do with Classic. Then I would have access to the smart previews anywhere and could edit as needed. BUT, If I have to go into CC and create a new album/folder for each folder and subfolder that I have currently, then there is no point in me having the subscription because I'll never have time to do that. I have upwards of 50,000 photos.

Is there a way I can use the Adobe services to which I have access to streamline my workflow and have cloud-based access, while still being able to use the expanded functionality of Classic and store my originals where they can auto-backup to a third storage?

I'm not sure if this answers your question enough. Let me know if you need more info. Thanks again.

Laura
Victoria Bampton LR Queen
Community Expert
Community Expert
November 18, 2017
No magic tricks here Laura. The new LR CC app isn't targeted at professional photographers, at least at this point in time.  It's a different tool for a different job.

How have you been working until now? Understanding more about your workflow would allow us to make more useful suggestions.

Lightroom Classic is undoubtedly the right main tool for you right now, but there are options. Lightroom Classic has an import/export catalog feature which would allow you to edit on either computer using the full power of Lightroom Classic.

Or do you need access to the originals on your laptop, or just to be able to edit in Lightroom? The reason I ask is Lightroom Classic lets you sync smart previews to the cloud, which you could then access/edit using Lightroom CC on the laptop. It's a bit of a hybrid workflow, so there are some compromises - not everything syncs - but it's a fairly simple option if you just need to send specific jobs to your laptop for editing while traveling.
Victoria - The Lightroom Queen
laurab78462711
Participant
November 17, 2017
I'm having the same problem, and I seriously CANNOT BELIEVE that Adobe would expect professional photographers (their main user population for Lightroom) to go through and manually recreate hundreds of folders. I have folders that have 4 and 5 levels of sub-folders containing thousands of photos -- each of which was painstakingly named at the time of their creation.  

Dragging them into collections seems easy, but it still requires that I manually do each subfolder as a collection within a collection set.  Plus, I can't tell whether Lightroom CC will migrate the newly created collections as collections or as folders, albums or what. I want them to be folders, not collections. 

I just spent 30 minutes on the phone with a support tech and nearly started crying at the end. If there is not a simple way to migrate (or import directly from my hard drive into CC) my folder structure, I won't be able to use CC any time in the near future. It will take me WEEKS of doing nothing but creating folders and importing the photos one folder at a time. I *need* to be able to use Lightroom CC so that I can edit from my desktop or my laptop while traveling, but I don't have weeks to dedicate to this process.

If Classic could import folders from my hard drive so intelligently, why can't the product that is supposed to be an improvement on Classic do that? 

Somebody please tell me there's a way.
Inspiring
October 30, 2017
I am just evaluating CC but this is a showstopper to me. I cannot afford to recreate my folders' structure - that should be a basic step in this software.
Sean Clarke
Participant
October 19, 2017
Let me explain.

The hard way: right click, create a folder, type in the name, click add photos, browse to where the new photos are, drag them in, approve them for review, wait.

The easy way: drag and drop a folder with photos onto Lightroom CC - it then creates a folder with the same name, imports the photos, done
The easy way: click add photos, choose a folder, photos get added

Sadly I don;t think the easy ways exist.
Victoria Bampton LR Queen
Community Expert
Community Expert
October 19, 2017
I'm not 100% sure I'm following the question, but when adding new photos to LRCC, you can create an album at the top of the Add Photos dialog. Did I miss the point?
Victoria - The Lightroom Queen
Sean Clarke
Participant
October 19, 2017
OK - i'll give that a try.

Is there a way to add folders of images to Lightroom CC?

Drag and drop a folder, where it creates a folder or album in CC and adds the photos as well.
Rather than have to create a folder, than add the photos.... slowly.....